0
What else can I help you with?
What are the 3 ways of formulating hypothesis?
Hypotheses can be formulated in three primary ways: by using deductive reasoning, where specific predictions are made based on general principles; through inductive reasoning, where generalizations are drawn from specific observations; and by employing a null hypothesis, which posits that there is no effect or relationship between variables, serving as a basis for statistical testing. Each method allows researchers to explore relationships and test theories systematically.
Does Deductive reasoning requires that a person start with a specific example?
No, deductive reasoning does not require starting with a specific example. Instead, it begins with general principles or premises and derives specific conclusions from them. The process involves applying established rules or facts to reach a logical conclusion, moving from the general to the specific. Thus, the focus is on the logical relationships between statements rather than specific instances.
A t is a type of deductive reasoning that draws a conclusion from two specific observations?
A syllogism is a type of deductive reasoning that draws a conclusion from two specific premises or observations. It typically consists of a major premise, a minor premise, and a conclusion that logically follows from the two premises. For example, if all humans are mortal (major premise) and Socrates is a human (minor premise), then it concludes that Socrates is mortal. This method of reasoning helps to clarify relationships between different statements and can be used to derive new knowledge from established facts.
What is the difference between discovery science and hypothesis-driven science?
Discovery science is mostly about describing nature, whereas hypothesis-driven science tries to explain nature.
What is the difference between the scientific and the non scientific method?
The scientific method requires precise observation and reasoning, and intellectual discipline, and honesty. The non scientific method is something you make up to suit yourself, and therefore, it could be anything you choose.
What is the difference between deductive reasoning and inductive reasoning?
Deductive reasoning starts with a general principle and applies it to a specific situation to reach a certain conclusion. Inductive reasoning starts with specific observations and uses them to make a generalization or prediction.
What are inductive and deductive reasoning?
the answer between the two:)deductive: means something...no questions about itinductive: questionable
Describe a conclusion reached from observations?
A "conjecture" is a conclusion reached simply from observations...this is a process known as "inductive reasoning". An example would be a weather forecast. The difference between "inductive reasoning" and "deductive reasoning" is that with deductive reasoning, the answer must "necessarily" follow from a set of premises. Inductive reasoning is the process by which you make a mathematical "hypothesis" given a set of observations
Difference between inductive and deductive reasoning?
inductive reasoning is self propagation and self establishedinductive reasoning starts with empirical observations of specific phenomena, then establishes a general rule to fit the observed facts.deductive reasoning starts with a general rule, then applies that rule to a specific instance.
What is difference between inductive theory and deductive theory?
Inductive theory involves forming general principles based on specific observations, moving from specific instances to broader conclusions. Deductive theory involves applying general principles to specific situations, moving from general concepts to specific predictions or explanations. Essentially, inductive reasoning builds from observation to theory, while deductive reasoning applies theory to specific situations.
What is the difference between inductive an deductive method?
Deductive reasoning is sometimes referred to as a "top down" approach, in other words deductive reasoning works from the more general to the more specific. It often starts with a theory and is then narrowed down to an actual, testable hypothesis, that can be confirmed or denied by observation. Inductive reasoning is the inverse approach, a "bottom up" approach. It begins with an observation and through observation patterns and regularities are observed and can be applied to a more generalized theory.
What is the difference between descriptive statistic and inductive?
The descriptive statistics deals with prediction. The inductive and the deductive statistics basically deals with presumption. The inductive statistics is used in making predictions.
What is the different between inductive and deductive statistics?
Inductive statistic deals with prediction while deductive statistic deals with presumption
What is the difference between deductive and subjective reasoning?
the difference between deductive and subjective reasoning is that deductive reasoning is a logical process in which a conclusion drawn from a set of premises contains no more information than the premises taken collectively. While subjective reasoning is drawn from past experience.
What are the similarities between inductive and deductive logic?
Inductive and deductive logic both involve reasoning processes used to draw conclusions from premises. They share the goal of establishing valid arguments, where the strength of the conclusion relies on the quality of the premises. Additionally, both methods can be used in scientific reasoning, where inductive logic helps form hypotheses based on observations, while deductive logic tests these hypotheses through structured arguments. Ultimately, both approaches are essential for critical thinking and problem-solving.
What is the differences between inductive and deductive approaches to research theory?
Inductive approach involves generating theories based on observations and patterns identified in the data, while deductive approach tests existing theories against empirical evidence. Inductive reasoning moves from specific observations to broader generalizations, whereas deductive reasoning moves from general principles to specific predictions. Both approaches are used in scientific research to build knowledge and test hypotheses.
Can you provide examples of deductive and inductive reasoning to illustrate the differences between the two approaches?
Deductive reasoning starts with a general principle and applies it to specific cases to reach a logical conclusion. For example, "All humans are mortal. John is a human. Therefore, John is mortal." Inductive reasoning involves making generalizations based on specific observations. For example, "Every swan I have seen is white, so all swans are white."
