answersLogoWhite

0

A scientific experiment involves manipulating variables to test a hypothesis under controlled conditions, allowing for the establishment of cause-and-effect relationships. In contrast, systematic observation involves carefully documenting and analyzing phenomena without altering them, often to identify patterns or correlations. While experiments aim for precise conclusions through intervention, systematic observation focuses on gathering data in a natural setting to inform theories or generate hypotheses. Both methods are essential in the scientific process, but they serve different purposes and approaches.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

1mo ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What are the steps in scietific method?

From Wiki: consisting in (of) systematic observation, measurement, and experiment, and the formulation, testing, and modification of hypotheses


What is a scientific investestigation?

Scientific investigation is a systematic method in which scientists and researchers answers particular questions about the world around us. It consists of the following: an observation, a question or a problem, hypothesis, an experiment and a conclusion.


What is the use of objective and systematic observation to test observation to test theory that is employed by sociologist?

The Scientific Method


What does the scientific mathod mean?

Scientific method is a systematic approach to problem solving.


The general term for a systematic approach used in scientific study is?

A systematic approach used in scientific study. It typically includes an observation, a hypothesis, experiments, data analysis, and a conclusion.


What is information acquired by direct observation and measurement using systematic scientific methods?

Empirical evidence


What is the use of objective and systematic observation to test theories on that is often employed by sociologists?

The Scientific Method


What is the use of objective and systematic observation to test theories one that is often employed?

The scientific method


WHAT IS THE SCIENCE?

The systematic KNowledge of universe which we gain through experiment and observation called science.


How was or wasn't the scientific method followed in this experiment?

To assess whether the scientific method was followed in the experiment, we need to identify key components such as the formulation of a clear hypothesis, systematic observation, experimentation, data collection, and analysis. If the experiment included these steps, it adhered to the scientific method. However, if it lacked a defined hypothesis, controlled variables, or relied on anecdotal evidence, it may not have fully followed the scientific method. Ultimately, the rigor and structure of the approach taken will determine its adherence to the scientific method.


How was it wasn't the scientific method followed in this experiment?

The scientific method may not have been followed in the experiment if there was a lack of a clear hypothesis, systematic observation, or controlled variables. Additionally, if data collection was not objective or repeatable, or if conclusions were drawn without proper analysis of the results, the integrity of the scientific method would be compromised. Furthermore, if the experiment did not include a peer review process, it could undermine the reliability of the findings. Overall, adherence to the scientific method is crucial for valid and credible scientific inquiry.


How was or wasn't the scientific method followed in this experiment A. The scientific method was not followed because the experiment was not repeated many times by many different people. B. The scient?

The scientific method was not properly followed in this experiment because it lacked repetition and validation by multiple researchers, which are essential for verifying results and ensuring reliability. Additionally, without a clear hypothesis, systematic observation, and controlled variables, the experiment does not adhere to the structured approach that characterizes the scientific method. Consequently, the findings may not be robust or generalizable.