That multi-celled animals exist. Without evolution we'd just be strands of RNA swimming or blowing about.
No answer.
Observation of finches on the Galapagos Islands.
I do not ' believe ' in evolution, but I am convinced by the evidence.
"The evidence for evolution countervails over the arguments against it." THis means that evidence for evolution counteracts the arguments against it.
Fossils can be used as evidence for evolution because they can show the development of a species over a long period of time.
He proposed a theory that attempts to explain why and the fact of evolution works.It is, so far, the best and most accurate theory that adequately explains why evolution happens.
You could never get any type of evidence to prove untrue things...
That evolutionary theory is accurate, at least in its fundamental theses: common descent and natural selection.
I suppose it is after all there are som many evidence about it for example the ancestor things to do with apes.
theory of evolution
Evolution is stupid. it isnt accurate.
Indirect Evidence of Evolution - is looking for signs of the results of evolution. - is evidence that can be used to deduce what you are trying to understand.
It does hint at common ancestry so it is "evidence" of evolution.
NO. take Darwin's theory of evolution for example. there is no real evidence, but it is accepted as fact by most in America today.
Evolution
In evolution the study of vertebrate forelimbs is related to the anatomical evidence from homology.
There are thousands of instances of direct evidence of evolution. The most well-known example is that of Darwin's Finches. These finches were observed through fossil records to have changed over time to adapt to their environment.
how does adaptations give evidence for evolution?