The purpose of controlling the environment when testing a hypothesis is ultimately to get a reliable result to the study.
By testing.
the process is to know what they hypothesis means
No, science does not advance without testing hypotheses.
Then explain why it was wrong
The idea that you are testing or proving/disproving.
Only if you are testing a hypothesis through a specific relevant experiment.
1) Determine the focus & direction for a research effort. 2) Development of a hypothesis forces the researcher to clearly state the purpose of the research activity. 3) Determine what variables will not be considered in a study, as well as those that will be considered.
forming a hypothesis is when you come up with an educated guess.. what you think it may be . testing a hypothesis is when you're testing to see if someone else's guess is right.
examining/ experimenting/ testing/ verifying... it depends on the type of hypothesis to an extent I think.
Experiments that follow the scientific method are an example of science activities. They involve testing a hypothesis by manipulating one or more variables while controlling the others.
In fact, any statistical relationship in a sample can be interpreted in two ways: ... The purpose of null hypothesis testing is simply to help researchers decide ... the null hypothesis in favour of the alternative hypothesis—concluding that there is a ...
A hypothesis is a suggestion of a way to explain something. If the hypothesis is tested and confirmed, it can advance to the status of theory. The conclusion of testing a hypothesis will be either that the hypothesis is confirmed, or it is not confirmed.
Rejecting a true null hypothesis.
You use a z test when you are testing a hypothesis that is using proportions You use a t test when you are testing a hypothesis that is using means
an experiment
By testing.
Testing experimentally a hypothesis is the last step.