Scientific explanations are tentative proposals that are subject to evaluation, modification, or even overturn in light of further evidence. An explanation is a statement or account that makes something clear, or a reason or justification given for an action or belief. The basic difference is that a scientific explanation is a proposal that is subject to evaluation, modification, or overturn, and an explanation simply makes something clear or gives a reason or justification.
There is a very strong relationship between emerging scientific ideas and open-mindedness. In order to accept new scientific ideas, one must have an open mind about how the world works.
ReSearch
People tend to say that scientific theories are "just" a theory because of a confusion between the common usage of "theory" and the scientific definition. (In everyday speech people often use the word "theory" in the sense of a "hunch" or "vague idea". This is not what the word means in a scientific context). A scientific theory is deduced from observations and is the simplest way of describing natural phenomena. It is testable, observable, predictable, and falsifiable. Scientific theories are not the same thing as hypotheses, which are explanations that haven't been demonstrated or verified. A scientific theory has evidence to back it up. The common usage of 'theory' suggests an explanation that someone hasn't proven, or isn't able to prove. It doesn't imply evidence that has been tested; it doesn't imply predictability. When someone hears, for example, "Big Bang theory" or "the theory of evolution", they may hear the word 'theory' and associate those scientific theories with someone's opinion or suggestion. In reality, these theories are the best scientific explanations for a myriad of phenomena across multiple scientific definitions. In science, "just a theory" is a very good place to be.
Scientific theory is a well supported by evidence set of principles that explain and predict natural phenomenon. A scientific law explains what some phenomenon does scientifically and under the same conditions.
One way to distinguish between a pseudoscientific explanation and a scientific explanation is to look at whether the explanation is based on evidence that can be tested and verified through rigorous experimentation and observation. Scientific explanations rely on empirical evidence and follow the principles of the scientific method, while pseudoscientific explanations often lack empirical evidence and rely on anecdotal or unverifiable claims.
The main similarity between scientific theories and scientific laws is that both are supported by extensive evidence and are used to explain natural phenomena. However, theories are broader explanations that can be modified or refined based on new evidence, while laws are specific statements that describe a consistent pattern observed in nature.
the relationship between a scientific investigation and a scientific knowledge is that they lead to constantly changing.
Causation is difficult to prove because it involves establishing a direct link between a specific cause and its effect, which can be complex and influenced by various factors. It often requires rigorous scientific evidence and careful consideration of alternative explanations to establish a clear causal relationship.
B. Scientific law. Scientific laws describe a relationship between variables based on consistent patterns observed in experiments or observations, without providing an explanation for why this relationship exists. Hypotheses and theories, on the other hand, propose explanations for observed phenomena.
relationship between scientific and philosophical method of investigation
The relationship between memetics and pseudoscience is that memetics is a field that studies how ideas spread and evolve, while pseudoscience refers to beliefs or practices that are presented as scientific but lack evidence or credibility. Some pseudoscientific ideas may spread rapidly through society due to the principles of memetics, even though they are not based on scientific evidence.
In scientific research, a hypothesis is a proposed explanation for a phenomenon, while a thesis is a statement or theory that is supported by evidence. A hypothesis is tested to support or refute a thesis in scientific research.
There is no scientific evidence to support a relationship between ear shape and intelligence. Intelligence is a complex trait influenced by a variety of factors, such as genetics, environment, and education. Ear shape is not a reliable indicator of intelligence.
Scientific explanations are tentative proposals that are subject to evaluation, modification, or even overturn in light of further evidence. An explanation is a statement or account that makes something clear, or a reason or justification given for an action or belief. The basic difference is that a scientific explanation is a proposal that is subject to evaluation, modification, or overturn, and an explanation simply makes something clear or gives a reason or justification.
A claim in the scientific method refers to a statement asserting a relationship between two or more variables. This statement is based on evidence and analysis of data collected through experimentation or observation. Claims must be supported by evidence and subject to rigorous testing to determine their validity.
scientific theories are build on different hypothesizes