0
What else can I help you with?
What term is used to indicate a hypothesis that is supported by repeated experiments and a lot of data?
the term that indicates the hypothesis is called hypothesis factor attack
Can data support or reject a hypothesis but never prove it?
Yes, data can support or reject a hypothesis but cannot definitively prove it. Scientific hypotheses are subject to testing and revision based on new evidence, and data can indicate the likelihood of a hypothesis being true or false. However, since new data could emerge at any time, conclusions remain tentative, emphasizing the provisional nature of scientific knowledge. Thus, while data can lend strong support, it cannot provide absolute proof.
Which of the following describes a reason for making a prediction when doing a controlled experiment?
To indicate what specific results will support a hypothesis to anticipate the observations or measurements that will be made apex
Does the qualitative observations have to be related to what your hypothesis is?
Original Answer:I would tie it back in and show whether it helped to reject/fail to reject your hypothesis.Different Answer:A hypothesis (Informal definition), is basically a question based on anticipated results. The experiment is created to try to prove or disprove that hypothesis. When conducting an experiment, only three results can occur. That is the hypothesis is confirmed, the hypothesis is incorrect, or the results were inconclusive. Of the three possible answer, the third is the most maddening as it could indicate that something is wrong with your experiment.Sometimes the most fascinating discoveries come from observations that are either inconclusive, or disprove a hypothesis.
Which describes a reason for making a prediction when doing a controlled experiment?
To determine what sort of data table will be most useful APEX;)
What term is used to indicate a hypothesis that is supported by repeated experiments and a lot of data?
the term that indicates the hypothesis is called hypothesis factor attack
What if your hypothesis is correct?
Your hypothesis is supported by the data. You cannot prove a hypothesis because somebody may do some other experiments and disprove it eventually. You can only disprove a hypothesis or indicate that it is supported by the data.
Can data support or reject a hypothesis but never prove it?
Yes, data can support or reject a hypothesis but cannot definitively prove it. Scientific hypotheses are subject to testing and revision based on new evidence, and data can indicate the likelihood of a hypothesis being true or false. However, since new data could emerge at any time, conclusions remain tentative, emphasizing the provisional nature of scientific knowledge. Thus, while data can lend strong support, it cannot provide absolute proof.
Which of the following describes a reason for making a prediction when doing a controlled experiment?
To indicate what specific results will support a hypothesis to anticipate the observations or measurements that will be made apex
If careful and accurate scientific measurement disagree wit the measurement presicted bt theory is what?
Exactly how a theory is tested. Or rather, we should say that this is exactly how a hypothesis is tested. If a careful and accurate scientific measurement disagrees with the prediction of a hypothesis, then it never gets far enough to become a theory. But OK. Let's say that everything the hypothesis predicted was conformed by measurement, and the hypothesis was elevated to the rank of Theory. And then, 50 years later, somebody does a new measurement with better equipment, and it doesn't agree with a prediction of the theory. What happens is: The theory has to change. Either we have to find a way to adjust or modify the theory so that it explains the new measurement, or else the theory is discarded. Either way, if the measurement is trustworthy (and can be repeated by others), then the theory can't continue to be accepted in its present form.
Is staten island floating?
There is no scientific studies or data to indicate it is sinking.
Is 1.305 written in scientific notation?
No. You need to indicate the appropriate power of 10.
Are scientific journals italicized in academic writing?
Yes, scientific journals are typically italicized in academic writing to indicate the title of the publication.
Are scientific articles italicized in academic writing?
Yes, scientific articles are typically italicized in academic writing to indicate that they are titles of specific works.
What is scientific notation and how do you use it?
Scientific notation is the use of exponents to indicate large numbers; for example, the number 25,000,000 can also be written in the form 2.5 x 107
Why are the larger t-ratios more likely to be statistically significant?
Larger t-ratios indicate a greater difference between the sample mean and the null hypothesis mean relative to the variability in the data. This suggests that the observed effect is less likely to be due to random chance. As a result, larger t-ratios are more likely to exceed the critical value for significance, leading to a higher probability of rejecting the null hypothesis. Thus, they often indicate stronger evidence against the null hypothesis.
Does the qualitative observations have to be related to what your hypothesis is?
Original Answer:I would tie it back in and show whether it helped to reject/fail to reject your hypothesis.Different Answer:A hypothesis (Informal definition), is basically a question based on anticipated results. The experiment is created to try to prove or disprove that hypothesis. When conducting an experiment, only three results can occur. That is the hypothesis is confirmed, the hypothesis is incorrect, or the results were inconclusive. Of the three possible answer, the third is the most maddening as it could indicate that something is wrong with your experiment.Sometimes the most fascinating discoveries come from observations that are either inconclusive, or disprove a hypothesis.
