0
What else can I help you with?
Why do scientists repeat other researchers experiment?
Scientists repeat others' experiments to double check their findings as well as to find new information that might have been missed initially.
What might cause scientists to change scientific theory?
Because technology might change in the future.
Why might a scientist need to repeat a step i scientific methods?
A scientist may need to repeat a step in the scientific method to ensure the reliability and accuracy of their results. Repetition can help identify any anomalies or errors in data collection or experimental design. Additionally, repeating steps can provide further evidence to support or refute a hypothesis, contributing to the overall validity of the research findings. Ultimately, repetition is essential for verifying results and building confidence in scientific conclusions.
Why might a scientist need to repeat a step in scientific method?
So he/she could look at the data again if something goes wrong.
How can non-scientific methods be used to acquire knowledge?
Non-scientific methods, such as intuition, personal experience, cultural narratives, and anecdotal evidence, can provide valuable insights and knowledge that might not be captured through scientific inquiry. These approaches often draw on subjective understanding and practical wisdom, allowing individuals to make sense of their experiences and surroundings. While they may lack the rigor of scientific methods, they can complement scientific knowledge by offering perspectives that reflect human emotions, social contexts, and individual experiences. Ultimately, combining both scientific and non-scientific methods can lead to a more holistic understanding of complex issues.
Why might a scientists need to repeat a step in scientific methods?
They want to make sure that their data is repeatable.
Why might a scientists need to repeat a step in scientific method?
So he/she could look at the data again if something goes wrong.
Why might a scientists repeat an experiment?
Scientists repeat their experiments because to make sure that their results are correct.
Why might scientist repeat an experiment?
Scientists repeat their experiments because to make sure that their results are correct.
Why do scientists repeat other researchers experiment?
Scientists repeat others' experiments to double check their findings as well as to find new information that might have been missed initially.
Why might it be important for scientists to be able to communicate their methods and their findings?
Scientists first create an hypothesis. They develop methods to prove their hypothesis. In order for other scientists to replicate the findings and prove or disprove another scientist's outcome, the original scientist MUST describe the methods used and the findings.
What might cause scientists to change scientific theory?
Because technology might change in the future.
Why might a scientist need to repeat a step i scientific methods?
A scientist may need to repeat a step in the scientific method to ensure the reliability and accuracy of their results. Repetition can help identify any anomalies or errors in data collection or experimental design. Additionally, repeating steps can provide further evidence to support or refute a hypothesis, contributing to the overall validity of the research findings. Ultimately, repetition is essential for verifying results and building confidence in scientific conclusions.
Why might a scientist need to repeat a step in scientific method?
So he/she could look at the data again if something goes wrong.
Why might scientists make a measurement more than one time?
Scientists may repeat measurements to check for consistency and reduce errors. By taking multiple measurements, scientists can calculate an average value to improve accuracy and reliability of their results.
Why does Answers com publish an etymology of the phrase carbon neutral which states that carbon IS a contributor to global warming when according to all research so far this is not proven to be fact?
Because there is no such thing as a 'scientific fact'. Even gravity is not a 'scientific fact'. Scientists do not work with 'facts' but will levels of confidence, of probability. When there is a high level of confidence among the entire scientific community on a particular issue, that is called a 'consensus'. When a scientists has a different opinion (ie, after conducting research and writing a scientific paper), such a differing opinion is generally called a 'hypothesis'. For example: the general scientific consensus is that the earth is round. However, there are still some hypothesis regarding the earth being flat. As long as scientists claiming the earth being flat are not able to convince their fellow scientists through validated research methods which can be repeated by others and peer-reviewed publications in scientific journals, the scientific consensus will not alter. Same is applicable to carbon. The general consensus is that it is a contributor to Global Warming while a minority of scientists have differing hypothesis. Some day their hypothesis might become the general consensus but for that to happen they first have to convince their fellow scientists of the validity of their scientific claims and their research.
How can non-scientific methods be used to acquire knowledge?
Non-scientific methods, such as intuition, personal experience, cultural narratives, and anecdotal evidence, can provide valuable insights and knowledge that might not be captured through scientific inquiry. These approaches often draw on subjective understanding and practical wisdom, allowing individuals to make sense of their experiences and surroundings. While they may lack the rigor of scientific methods, they can complement scientific knowledge by offering perspectives that reflect human emotions, social contexts, and individual experiences. Ultimately, combining both scientific and non-scientific methods can lead to a more holistic understanding of complex issues.
