Reasoning that uses specific examples to explain is known as inductive reasoning. This approach involves drawing general conclusions based on particular instances or evidence. For instance, observing that the sun has risen every morning provides the basis for concluding that it will rise again tomorrow. By relying on concrete examples, this reasoning helps to build a case or establish a pattern.
Inductive reasoning
Inductive reasoning
logic reasoning
Deductive reasoning
The reasoning that uses specific observations to make generalizations is called inductive reasoning. It involves drawing broader conclusions based on a limited set of observations or examples. For instance, if you observe that the sun has risen in the east every morning, you might generalize that the sun always rises in the east. While inductive reasoning can lead to plausible conclusions, it does not guarantee certainty, as future observations may contradict the generalization.
Inductive reasoning
Inductive reasoning
inductive reasoning
Yes
To accurately determine the type of reasoning Terrell uses in her speech, one would need to analyze the content and structure of her arguments. Typically, speakers may employ deductive reasoning, where they start with a general principle and apply it to specific cases, or inductive reasoning, where they draw broader conclusions from specific examples. Additionally, Terrell might use causal reasoning to link actions to outcomes or analogical reasoning to compare similar situations. Understanding her specific approach would depend on the themes and examples she presents.
In this scenario, the person is using deductive reasoning. Deductive reasoning involves starting with a general theory or hypothesis and then applying it to specific situations to arrive at a conclusion.
logic reasoning
Deductive reasoning
Deductive reasoning
Deductive reasoning
Deductive reasoning
The author mainly uses deductive reasoning in the argument, presenting a logical chain of thought starting from a general statement and leading to a specific conclusion. This is supported by evidence and examples to reinforce the main points.