Nothing. A hypothesis is just a guess as to a possible explanation of something. If it's wrong, it's wrong. No big deal.
If you still desire to explain the thing, you should develop a new hypothesis.
If an experiment does not confirm his hypothesis, the scientist should report this honestly. Even if the results confirmed the hypothesis, further testing should be done by him or others to gather more data.
If a hypothesis is found to be incorrect, the next step is to analyze the data and observations that led to this conclusion to identify potential errors or alternative explanations. Researchers should then revise the hypothesis based on these insights and design new experiments or observations to test the updated hypothesis. This iterative process helps refine understanding and contributes to the advancement of knowledge.
If the data from an investigation does not support the original hypothesis then either:The method of investigation may be flawed and may need to be changed and repeated.The interpretation of the data may be incorrect and should be reviewed.The hypothesis needs to be reevaluated to possibly conform to the data.
if the hypothesis is proven to be correct or incorrect
Reject the hypothesis.
to see if your hypothesis was correct or incorrect.
If an experiment does not confirm his hypothesis, the scientist should report this honestly. Even if the results confirmed the hypothesis, further testing should be done by him or others to gather more data.
say that your hypothesis is incorrect in your conclusion
If a hypothesis is found to be incorrect, the next step is to analyze the data and observations that led to this conclusion to identify potential errors or alternative explanations. Researchers should then revise the hypothesis based on these insights and design new experiments or observations to test the updated hypothesis. This iterative process helps refine understanding and contributes to the advancement of knowledge.
If the data from an investigation does not support the original hypothesis then either:The method of investigation may be flawed and may need to be changed and repeated.The interpretation of the data may be incorrect and should be reviewed.The hypothesis needs to be reevaluated to possibly conform to the data.
If your hypothesis is totally incorrect then it is quite likely that the data will not support it.
if the hypothesis is proven to be correct or incorrect
Reject the hypothesis.
just admit you were wrong, and start over, because a hypothesis is what you think might happen
First you need a purpose. The purpose should start with the purpose if my investigation is. Next is the hypothesis. The hypothesis has to have if, then, and because. Then is your materials and procedure. After that, you have to collect the data. Then there is the anaylisis. The anaylisis has to have I learned that. Finally, there is the conclusion. It has to have four sentences. I learned that, my hypothesis was..., my hypothesis was correct or incorrect, and next time I will.
If a hypothesis is tested and found to be incorrect, we say that the hypothesis has been disproven or rejected. This means that the evidence collected does not support the initial prediction or explanation proposed by the hypothesis. It is an essential part of the scientific method, as it helps refine theories and guide further research. Ultimately, disproving a hypothesis contributes to the advancement of knowledge in the field.
False. When a hypothesis is shown to be incorrect, it does not necessarily mean the experiment is a failure. It provides valuable information and contributes to the scientific process by ruling out one possible explanation, allowing for further refinement of the hypothesis.