when it is consistent with observation
In the general, every day sense of the word a theory is a supposition, a hunch or a speculation. It is unproven.A Scientific Theory is completely different from an every day theory. A scientific theory summarizes a hypothesis that has been supported with repeated testing and with facts that can be observed and/or measured. With that support a hypothesis moves to the next step in the scientific method and becomes accepted as a valid explanation of a phenomenon. Facts are the framework for the scientific method and a Scientific Theory is supported by facts.
A scientific theory summarizes a hypothesis or group of hypotheses that have been supported with repeated testing. If enough evidence accumulates to support a hypothesis, it moves to the next step; known as a theory; in the scientific method and becomes accepted as a valid explanation of a phenomenon.
No, the scientific method can be uncontrolled to for it to be valid.
You needn't a scientific definition for it. Theory is something waiting to be proved in the future that it was not a theory in the past. It was a valid idea. However, if you want to go deeper on this issue, there is a link right below.
Personal opinions, beliefs, or anecdotes that are not supported by empirical evidence will not be considered valid within a scientific theory. Theories must be testable, falsifiable, and based on systematic observation and data analysis. Emotional reasoning or cultural bias should also not influence the development or acceptance of a scientific theory.
when it is consistent with observation
its to old
It is to old
A theory must provide an explanation for an observation and be reinforced by observational data and experimentation.
In the general, every day sense of the word a theory is a supposition, a hunch or a speculation. It is unproven.A Scientific Theory is completely different from an every day theory. A scientific theory summarizes a hypothesis that has been supported with repeated testing and with facts that can be observed and/or measured. With that support a hypothesis moves to the next step in the scientific method and becomes accepted as a valid explanation of a phenomenon. Facts are the framework for the scientific method and a Scientific Theory is supported by facts.
Scientific Theory is tested by observations and experiments predicted by the theory. If the observations confirm the theory the theory is validated if not the theory is not validated. Experiments themselves need validation, often there are errors in the experiments or observations, e.g Michaelson and Morley Aether experiment and red shift observations.
A scientific theory summarizes a hypothesis or group of hypotheses that have been supported with repeated testing. If enough evidence accumulates to support a hypothesis, it moves to the next step; known as a theory; in the scientific method and becomes accepted as a valid explanation of a phenomenon.
A model theory or law is considered valid if it accurately describes and predicts phenomena in a specific context, can be consistently tested and verified through experimentation or observation, and has stood up to scrutiny and peer review within the scientific community. Additionally, it should have practical utility and be able to make reliable and reproducible predictions.
A scientific theory is a hypothesis that has been repeatedly tested and still seems to be valid. These theories are tested by using the scientific method.
No, the scientific method can be uncontrolled to for it to be valid.
You needn't a scientific definition for it. Theory is something waiting to be proved in the future that it was not a theory in the past. It was a valid idea. However, if you want to go deeper on this issue, there is a link right below.