Mary Shelley would likely agree that the pursuit of science carries both the potential for great progress and significant moral responsibility. In "Frankenstein," she illustrates how unchecked ambition and the quest for knowledge can lead to unintended consequences and suffering. Shelley emphasizes the importance of considering ethical implications and the human condition in scientific endeavors, warning against the dangers of hubris. Ultimately, she advocates for a balanced approach to science that respects both its power and its limitations.
a scientist should not go beyond moral boundaries when trying to gain personal recognition or fame. got it from brainly
It is a social science, yes. But technically, isn't everything a science?
Emerson would most likely agree that individual intuition and self-reliance are paramount for personal growth and fulfillment. He championed the idea that true understanding and wisdom come from within, rather than from societal conventions or external authorities. Emphasizing the importance of nature, he believed that connecting with the natural world fosters spiritual insight and deeper self-awareness. Ultimately, Emerson advocated for the pursuit of one's unique path and the embrace of one's true self.
8 out of 10 cats agree.
Science is a discipline in which precision is important. Vocabulary must be equally understood by all persons. In order for students to comprehend the texts in Science, they must be able to understand the vocabulary, and agree upon the meaning.
Mary Shelley's novel "Frankenstein" explores the theme of the pursuit of knowledge without considering the consequences. She would likely agree with the cautionary tale that scientific advancements should be made responsibly, with ethical considerations and accountability for the potential impacts on society and the environment.
yes i agree,... wanna know why? it's because that's my opinion.., whats yours..., if you don't have an opinion ask your teacher because it's his/her job..., to teach his/her student..., understood?.....
The struggles of common people are the most powerful artistic subjects.
a scientist should not go beyond moral boundaries when trying to gain personal recognition or fame. got it from brainly
Plato and Aristotle likely agreed on the importance of education and the pursuit of knowledge as essential for the development of an individual and society. They both believed in the cultivation of virtue and the idea of the common good as guiding principles for a just society.
yez
Mary Shelley would likely agree that unchecked pursuit of scientific knowledge and advancement can lead to unforeseen consequences and ethical dilemmas, as seen in Frankenstein. She would caution against playing God and disrupting the natural order without considering the potential repercussions on society and humanity.
It is a social science, yes. But technically, isn't everything a science?
They agreed on Natural Rights (life liberty and the pursuit of happiness)
Ona would likely agree with the statement that capitalism can exploit individuals and communities in pursuit of profit, as depicted in "The Jungle" by Upton Sinclair. Through the novel's portrayal of the exploitation of immigrant workers in the meatpacking industry, Ona would likely resonate with the idea that capitalism can lead to social injustice and harsh working conditions.
If you are speaking of true science and not therretical science, then the Bible and science can agree. I have written article on SCIENCE AND THE SCRIPTURES and there is no disagreement between them.
The internet LOL I agree, but specifically we can look at many articles and blogs on science.