Cell Theory
Everybody has diff ideas. They all think that they are right. There is enough evidence to support a theory but not a law.
Scientist use scientific methods to test the new theory. They also examine all the evidence to see if it supports the new theory. Scientist accept a new theory when many test and pieces of evidence support it.
Scientists claim to offer only supporting evidence for a theory rather than proof because scientific inquiry is inherently provisional and open to revision. Theories are based on evidence collected through observation and experimentation, but new data or interpretations can emerge that challenge existing understandings. This approach acknowledges the possibility of uncertainty and the need for continual testing and refinement, which is fundamental to the scientific method. Thus, while evidence can strongly support a theory, it cannot definitively prove it in an absolute sense.
A scientist might reject a scientific theory if new empirical evidence contradicts its predictions or underlying principles. For instance, if experimental results consistently show outcomes that the theory cannot explain or predict accurately, this would undermine its validity. Additionally, if a theory fails to account for a significant body of existing data or if a more comprehensive alternative theory emerges, a scientist may deem it necessary to reject the original theory.
fossil evidence is when scientist study fossils to figure out how the animal died how it evoled
The scientist provided evidence for the theory of evolution by natural selection, which was proposed by Charles Darwin. Through observations of different species and their adaptations to their environments, the scientist showed how species can change over time to better suit their surroundings through the process of natural selection.
Scientist are always testing their models to get new information or results, but other times learning evidence makes scientist have to change their models so scientist can change their models in theory.
osama bin laden and adolf Hitler
Scientists prove a theory by conducting experiments, making observations, and collecting data that support the theoretical predictions. Consistent and reproducible results from these experiments provide evidence to support the theory. Additionally, peer review and scrutiny by other scientists help validate the theory.
Neil Bohr
Everybody has diff ideas. They all think that they are right. There is enough evidence to support a theory but not a law.
Yes
John Dalton did not have experimental evidence to support his theory of the atom when he proposed it in the early 19th century. His atomic theory was based on observational patterns rather than direct experimental data.
A scientist can prove a theory by conducting experiments, collecting data, and analyzing results to see if they consistently support the predictions made by the theory. The more evidence that aligns with the theory's predictions, the stronger the support for the theory. Additionally, peer review and replication of results by other scientists help confirm the validity of a theory.
John Dalton is considered the scientist who developed the modern atomic theory, providing evidence for the existence of atoms through his experimentation with gases.
No actual scientist has ever been involved in any flat earth hypothesis.There isn't enough evidence to call it a theory. In fact there is zero evidence.Believers are almost exclusively motivated by religious reasons or by conspiracy theory beliefs.
The English scientist who first offered strong evidence that atoms exist was John Dalton. He proposed his atomic theory in the early 19th century, which laid the foundation for modern atomic theory and our understanding of the nature of matter.