answersLogoWhite

0

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What are two things that all good hypothesis have to do?

Helllp


What are the two words that should be in your hypothesis?

The two words that need to be in a hypothesis are IF and THEN.


Two things you can do by using scientific method?

answer hypothesis and draw conclusions


What are two things you could do if you reject a hypothesis?

1). Present an observation or calculation that disproves the hypothesis. 2). Go off to your room and pout.


In order to be considered scientific a hypothesis must be?

It is necessary for a hypothesis to have two things, the words IF and THEN. Another word can be added, BECAUSE. A successful hypothesis has to have all three.


What must an hypothesis include?

A hypothesis must include a clear, testable statement that predicts the relationship between two or more variables. It should be specific enough to be measurable and formulated based on existing knowledge or observations. Additionally, a good hypothesis often includes an independent variable (the cause) and a dependent variable (the effect).


What is the difference between two source hypothesis and two gospel hypothesis?

null


Should you feel bad if you are good at math but not with 1000 word essays?

No you shouldn't they are two differnt things


Types of hypothesis?

The two main types of hypotheses are simple and complex hypothesis. The simple hypothesis predicts the relationship between a single dependent and independent variables. On the other hand, the complex hypothesis describes the relation between two or more dependent and independent variables.


What are two possible outcomes to prove an experiments hypothesis?

To prove the hypothesis. To disprove the hypothesis.


The hypothesis should include what is going to be measured.?

Yes, a hypothesis should clearly state the relationship between two variables and include what is being measured or observed in the study. It predicts the outcome of the research and guides the experiment or investigation.


How is the validity of a theory tasted?

Two means of testing the validity of a hypothesis: -- Does it adequately explain things that have already been observed ? -- Can observations of its predictions be achieved ? If a hypothesis passes both of these tests, it then becomes a theory.