answersLogoWhite

0

It's core principle is that individual organisms can pass characteristics acquired during their lifetime to offspring; for example, a thin man works out his whole life and develops large muscles, then has a son who will also have the large muscles. However current evolutionary theory dictates that only the genetic information that determines the genetic potential of an organism is passed on to offspring - in the example, his dad was thin so he will be too - so acclimation within this genetic potential (What Lamarckian theory would suggest is passed on) is not.

Of course as with most things within evolutionary theory that's just the current thinking, recent developments in Epigenetics for example suggest Lamarckian inheritance or aspects of it may actually exist within nature to some extent.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about General Science

Who disproved the idea of inheritance of acquired traits using tailless mice?

August Weismann but actually this theory of his was wrong....... Lamarck's idea was more appropriate...........


Explain how Mendel's particulate hypothesis is different from the blending hypothesis of inheritance?

Mendel showed in his experiments that inherited traits are not passed through the blending of inheritance theory. According to the blending of inheritance theory, an offspring's traits are a blend between the traits of the parent organisms. In Mendel's experiments however, he showed that this was not true, and that inheritance is actually based on genes, through the observation of recessive traits. He observed that an offspring could have a trait that neither of the parents had, which is now explained through both of the parents having the recessive gene for the trait, but not showing it because they are heterozygous dominant. There is a 25% chance that the offspring of two heterozygous dominant parents will produce a homozygous recessive offspring that will show the trait that neither of the parents shows.


Why is lamarck's theory not supported by the theory of natural selection?

Lamarck thought that traits organisms acquired during their lifetime would be passed on to offspring. He believed that traits were determined by use or disuse. However, acquired traits cannot be passed on to offspring; only traits determined by DNA can


What is an example of traits that you would expect to inherit if Lamarck's explanation of evolution were correct?

if I were to inherit traits based on Lamarcks explanation of evolution were correct we wouldn't be the people we are now. Lamarcks´ explanation was that acquired characteristics were genetically passed to the offspring so if that were so, the human brains would be much more developed, more knowledge, and bigger parts of the body. This question is also tricky since a human would turn out to be a giant by the time they got to the 100th offspring


Summarize the observations and inferences recognized as the backbone of evolution by natural selection?

1. variation-individuals vary in traits within a species. 2. inheritance- oppspring will inherit the traits 3. offspring with the best traits will survive and reproduce, others will die out.

Related Questions

What is Mendel's Theory?

Gregor Mendel was a biologist who studied the inheritance of traits. His laws for this inheritance are combined in Mendelian inheritance, which states that some alleles are dominant and as such some traits are dominant.


Was lamarcks idea of acquired traits proven or rejected?

rejected.


What is mendels theory of the transfer of traits?

Mendel's theory of the transfer of traits, also known as Mendelian inheritance, states that genetic traits are determined by the inheritance of alleles from parents. These alleles segregate independently during gamete formation and randomly combine during fertilization, resulting in offspring with specific traits based on the combinations of alleles inherited.


What later evidence disproved Lamarcks theory of acquired characteristics and supported Darwins theory?

Later evidence from genetics and molecular biology showed that acquired traits are not passed down through generations as proposed by Lamarck, as they do not alter the genetic material. On the other hand, Darwin's theory of natural selection was supported by the discovery of the mechanism of inheritance through genes and DNA, providing a more robust explanation for evolutionary change over time.


What is the base of lamarck theory?

The two concepts of the inheritance of acquired characteristics plus use and disuse of traits.


How was Darwin's theory of evolution different from lamarcks?

In Darwin's theory, natural selection plays the key role. Organisms vary through random mutations--slight changes from their parents. The environment determines which are most likely to survive. In Lamarck's theory, changes in phenotype are inherited. This is now known to be (largely) incorrect.


What are the 3 parts of Darwin's Theory of Evolution?

Darwin's Theory of Evolution consists of three main parts: variation, inheritance, and selection. Variation refers to differences in traits among individuals, inheritance involves passing on these traits to offspring, and selection entails the process by which certain traits become more common in a population due to their advantage in survival and reproduction.


What aspect of Jean Baptiste Lamarcks theories concerning the inheritance of acquired traits has been proved false?

Lamarck believed that changes acquired during an animal's life could be inherited by their offspring. We now know that inheritance does not work in this way. For example, if you are a body builder, and develop big muscles, your children will not inherit large muscles. Inherirtance works through genes, which are inherited through the egg and sperm from the parents.


Is inheritance of acquired traits included in the modern theory of evolution?

No, the inheritance of acquired traits is not included in the modern theory of evolution, which is primarily based on natural selection and genetic variation. This concept, originally proposed by Lamarck, suggests that traits acquired during an organism's lifetime can be passed on to the next generation. However, modern evolutionary biology, grounded in genetics, emphasizes that only heritable traits encoded in DNA can be passed on, and acquired traits do not alter the genetic material.


What is the theory of inheritance states that genes are located on chromosomes which undergo segregation and independent assortment?

The theory is known as Mendelian genetics, proposed by Gregor Mendel. It states that traits are determined by discrete units of inheritance (genes) located on chromosomes, which segregate during gamete formation and assort independently during inheritance.


How does evolution by natural selection differ from lamarcks view of evolution?

Evolution by natural selection, proposed by Charles Darwin, suggests that individuals with advantageous traits are more likely to survive and pass on those traits to their offspring, leading to changes in populations over time. Lamarck's view of evolution, on the other hand, proposed the inheritance of acquired traits, where organisms could pass on traits that they acquired during their lifetime. The key difference is that in natural selection, the advantageous traits are already present in the population and selected for, while Lamarck's theory suggests that organisms can actively acquire and pass on new traits.


Is inheritance of acquired traits part of lamarks theory?

Yes. Lamarck hypothesised that living beings acquired traits in their life times by power of will or use and disuse and passed it onto their offspring.