answersLogoWhite

0

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What would a scientist usually do after conducting a controlled experiment?

they would usually pay money to tony stark for everything they got


What would a scientist usually do after conduting a controlled experiment?

they would pay 1 million $ to hiue


Why might a scientist use stimulation in a controlled experiment?

The reason they would is because it is a lot safer.


How can scientist test a hypothesis if it is not possible to do a controlled experiment?

If they can't do a controlled experiment chances are they're advanced and know what they're doing. Depending on the experiment itself, the scientist would have to come up with a procedure that doesn't involve a control. Although there may be no official control, they probably still compare the results to something.


Why must a controlled experiment have one manipulated variable?

a controlled experiment must have only one manipulated variable becuase if the experiment had multiple manipulated variables then it would not be a controlled experiment anymore it would be a manipulated Deseret experiment


In a controlled experiment a scientist is studying how long a parachutes of different sizes to fall on the ground what is the manipulated variable?

The manipulated variable in this experiment would be the size of the parachute. The scientist would change the size of the parachutes to see how it affects the time it takes for them to fall to the ground.


What do scientist use to do their experiments?

The tools that a scientist would use to conduct an experiment would vary greatly on the nature of the experiment.


What is true controlled experiments produce valid data valid experiments produce controlled data controlled data produces valid experiments?

With controlled experiments it is taken into consideration what possible variables there could be and it is taken into account when conducting the experiment. This would mean that controlled experiments would produce more valid data.


A scientist is planning an experiment on the effect of the heat on the function of a certain enzyme Which would not be appropiate first step?

Starting the experiment without clearly defining the research question and objectives would not be an appropriate first step. It's crucial to have a clear understanding of what you want to investigate and achieve before conducting any experiment.


What would a scientist do before designing a experiment?

Be clear about the purpose of the experiment.


A scientist is planning to carry out an experiment on the effect of heat on the function of a certain chemical. which would not be an appropriate first step?

An inappropriate first step would be to start the experiment without conducting a literature review to understand existing knowledge on the chemical and its reaction to heat. This background information is essential for designing a relevant and informative experiment.


Why would a scientist need to do an experiment again?

donut