0
What else can I help you with?
Will similar investigations or expirements always have the same results?
no because they could do in different environment and could change.
Do scientists research the same problem and often find different results or similar results?
Yes, scientists often research the same problem and can find both different and similar results. Variations in methodologies, sample sizes, and interpretations of data can lead to differing conclusions. However, when studies are well-designed and reproducible, they may yield similar results, contributing to a consensus in the scientific community. This dynamic process of inquiry and debate is essential for advancing knowledge and understanding.
What happens when similar investigations give different results?
When similar investigations yield different results, it raises questions about the methodologies, sample sizes, or contexts of the studies. Discrepancies could indicate the influence of biases, errors in data collection, or variations in experimental conditions. Such differences often prompt further research to reconcile findings and deepen understanding, highlighting the complexity of the subject matter. Ultimately, this can lead to refined theories or new avenues for investigation.
When scientists are ready to publish the result of their experimentation why is it important for them to include a description of the procedures they used?
Good science is reproducible, meaning that other scientists should be able to conduct the same analysis and get similar results. If scientists try the experiments and get different results, then it often means that the original publishers did something wrong.
Which statement best expresses a basic scientific assumption?
If a conclusion is valid, similar investigations by other scientists should result in the same conclusion.
Will similar investigations or expirements always have the same results?
no because they could do in different environment and could change.
Do scientists research the same problem and often find different results or similar results?
Yes, scientists often research the same problem and can find both different and similar results. Variations in methodologies, sample sizes, and interpretations of data can lead to differing conclusions. However, when studies are well-designed and reproducible, they may yield similar results, contributing to a consensus in the scientific community. This dynamic process of inquiry and debate is essential for advancing knowledge and understanding.
When scientists are ready to publish the results of their experimentation why is it important for them to include a description of the procedure they used?
Good science is reproducible, meaning that other scientists should be able to conduct the same analysis and get similar results. If scientists try the experiments and get different results, then it often means that the original publishers did something wrong.
When scientists are ready to publish the result of their experimentation why is it important for them to include a description of the procedures they used?
Good science is reproducible, meaning that other scientists should be able to conduct the same analysis and get similar results. If scientists try the experiments and get different results, then it often means that the original publishers did something wrong.
When scientists are ready to publish the result of their experimentation why is it important for them to include a description of the procedures they use?
Good science is reproducible, meaning that other scientists should be able to conduct the same analysis and get similar results. If scientists try the experiments and get different results, then it often means that the original publishers did something wrong.
Which statement best expresses a basic scientific assumption?
If a conclusion is valid, similar investigations by other scientists should result in the same conclusion.
When scientist are ready to publish the results of their experimentation why is it important for them to include a description of the procedures the used?
Good science is reproducible, meaning that other scientists should be able to conduct the same analysis and get similar results. If scientists try the experiments and get different results, then it often means that the original publishers did something wrong.
When scientist are ready to publish the results of their experimentation why is it important for them to include a description of the procedures they used?
Good science is reproducible, meaning that other scientists should be able to conduct the same analysis and get similar results. If scientists try the experiments and get different results, then it often means that the original publishers did something wrong.
How do scientists and historians differ in their work How are their jobs similar?
Scientists work on different stuff then historians do.
How can unexpected results be as important as expected results in a science experiment?
So scientists can learn from their mistakes and they can look back on that information in a similar test.
How did alchemists similar to and different from modern scientists?
The alchemists were the first chemists. But in addition to mixing chemicals, they also believed that magic would help with their experiments and formulas. It didn't. But their experiments led to the development of the science of chemistry.
why might scientists conduct an experiment in a lab, and then repeat the experiment in the field?
To verify whether or not laboratory conditions are necessary to recreate the results. If the same experiment produces the same results in different environments, then the scientist knows that the results are sound. However, if the results are different in different places, then it may be an environmental factor of the laboratory that is affecting the outcome. Repeating the experiment in different environments allows scientists to either confirm or rule out this possibility.
