Without shelter, an individual would be exposed to the elements, facing risks from extreme weather conditions like heat, cold, rain, or snow. This exposure can lead to health issues such as hypothermia, heat exhaustion, or dehydration. Additionally, the lack of a safe and secure place can affect mental well-being, increase vulnerability to violence, and hinder access to basic necessities like food and healthcare. Overall, living without shelter significantly impacts both physical and psychological health.
Nothing would happen.
No I want the answer
nothing would had happened.
You would no be wearing anything
many animals will die
They wouldn't have a shelter, and die.
It would die from loss of it's natural shelter and food source.
the animal will go to the shelter or they go to the adoptian center.
They would most likely freeze to death unless they had shelter to take refuge in.
we would not be able to breath well and the animals would lose shelter and a lot of food and probably die out
If humans continued to destroy their shelters havoc would take over the world. This is because these action affect other people.
No. A bomb shelter is for overhead bombs dropped from planes, etc. A fallout shelter is referencing a nuclear fallout, which would mean it would be safe from radiation.
This is not a likely scenario, since there is nothing on the Antarctic continent to offer 'settlers' any resources in terms of food, shelter and economy.
Plants do not give us shelter. the right question would be '' who do trees give us shelter?'' the answer for that would be the are used to make homes.
A bomb shelter. A simplistic answer for a inane question.
A fallout shelter is a place were people would hid there stuff