This depends very much on the conditions the mold was grown under. For instance, if we are comparing how mold grows in light versus how mold grows in the dark, our null hypothesis may be 'Mold grows more rapidly in light than in the dark'. An essential factor to consider when setting a hypothesis is to ensure that it is testable (i.e. we are able to test the validity of the hypothesis and choose to accept/refute it). Hence, a statement such as 'Mold grows better in light than in the dark' is not testable (and would thus not qualify as a hypothesis), since there is no scientific definition of what is being implied by the term 'better'.
When their hypothesis for the conducted experiment is accurate.
A hypothesis is your best educated guess on what the outcome of the science fair project is going to be. So you would first need to come up with the science experiment that you want to do before you can come up with your hypothesis. Example: if your science project was mixing baking soda and vinegar together to see what type of reaction you will get, your hypothesis is your guess on what is going to happen when you mix the baking soda and vinegar together. So my hypothesis for that experiment of mixing baking soda and vinegar together is that it will foam up and overflow from the container that I mixed them in. If that happens then my hypothesis was correct. So you need to have an experiment in mind before you can make your hypothesis for the experiment.
Usually the current 'answer' to a scientific problem would be called a theory. However when used in an experiment people refer to the current answer to a problem as the nul hypothesis and the new, to be tested, theory as the alternative hypothesis.
If, through your experiment, your original hypothesis is falsified.
exact science consists in: -observation -hypothesis -experiment -conlusion when this conslusion is valuable for a great range of observations, and several experiments prove this, it is generally accepted.
When their hypothesis for the conducted experiment is accurate.
A new question in an experiment would be a revised hypothesis.
A hypothesis is your best educated guess on what the outcome of the science fair project is going to be. So you would first need to come up with the science experiment that you want to do before you can come up with your hypothesis. Example: if your science project was mixing baking soda and vinegar together to see what type of reaction you will get, your hypothesis is your guess on what is going to happen when you mix the baking soda and vinegar together. So my hypothesis for that experiment of mixing baking soda and vinegar together is that it will foam up and overflow from the container that I mixed them in. If that happens then my hypothesis was correct. So you need to have an experiment in mind before you can make your hypothesis for the experiment.
Usually the current 'answer' to a scientific problem would be called a theory. However when used in an experiment people refer to the current answer to a problem as the nul hypothesis and the new, to be tested, theory as the alternative hypothesis.
If you develop an experiment that truly demonstrates that the hypothesis is wrong*, then the hypothesis will lose its acceptance in the scientific community. * Such an experiment would have to be repeatable by other scientists AND accepted by interested scientists as a proof that the hypothesis is wrong.
If, through your experiment, your original hypothesis is falsified.
exact science consists in: -observation -hypothesis -experiment -conlusion when this conslusion is valuable for a great range of observations, and several experiments prove this, it is generally accepted.
You would use a hypothesis during an experiment. The experiment does not necessarily have to be of science, though the term hypothesis is primarily used for such category.wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn defines hypothesisas# a proposal intended to explain certain facts or observations # guess: a message expressing an opinion based on incomplete evidence A hypothesis is seen in the beginning of an experiment, stating a prediction by the one(s) conducting and carrying out the experiment. The rest of the experiment, or procedure with data, then serves to prove the hypothesis a true and possible prediction, or to be incorrect. The outcome of the experiment is what determines if the stated hypothesis is a successful and true proposal.The hypothesis's success or failure is recorded in the conclusion section of the experiment, located reasonably at the end.-youFITCH.
It depends entirely on what the hypothesis is.
The most likely hypothesis for the experiment was that increasing the temperature would speed up the reaction.
Reject the hypothesis.
yes my answers did support hypothesis because if u actully did the science experiment you would know if u also had studied so go STUDY!!!!!!!!!!!! IF UR COMMING HERE FOR AWSERS