In which of the following ways can scientific knowledge change and grow?
a popular scientist states that a prevailing theory is not correcta single experiment disproves a prevailing theorya large number of experiments challenge a prevailing theory-experiments reaffirm the validity of a prevailing theory.
People thought he was crazy and not very smart but he proved them. He found a way.
An idea that has scientific consensus is one that is widely accepted by the majority of experts in a particular field after extensive research, experimentation, and peer review. This consensus arises when multiple studies yield consistent results and conclusions, leading to a strong agreement among scientists. Such ideas are often supported by substantial evidence and are regarded as reliable within the scientific community, even though they may evolve with new discoveries. Examples include climate change due to human activity and the theory of evolution.
The main reason why Charles Darwin's theory of evolution was not accepted was because it was totally new. People never thought that animals branched down from older species. During his time, people thought that the reason why animals or other species existed was because it was god will. Other people believed in spontaneous birth. This was a belief that living things could be born from nothing. Also, most people were Christian, and Darwin was threatening the validity of the Bible. It would have been mad for people back then, the fact that they always relied on the Bible as fact, and suddenly there was other ideas to consider
This is a bit of a toughy really. Scientific theory can be thought of as falling into one of 3 categories. 1. Law. This is something that is generally accepted by all of the scientific community or the vast majority of those within the specific scientific field. e.g. Newton's Laws of motion etc 2 Theory. This is widely accepted by most of the scientific community or large amount of those in a specific field although opposing theories may exist. 3. Hypothesis (literally meaning below thesis or lower than theory). Is generally a new discovery or procedure to be introduced to the scientific community. So, coming back to your question: The purest scientific theory would probably be defined as Law, thus being accepted by all or the majority of the scientific community. Hope this helps.
In an experiment, there are many variables (things that can't be controlled). For an accurate result, experiments must be done many times over to so that a pattern can be seen, giving scientists an idea of what the result is. For example, if you tested how music affected plant growth, and tested it once, if the plant died because of other causes, it could seem like the music affected the plant. By doing the experiment many times and seeing no affect on the majority of the plants, the scientists would see that music has no affect on plant growth. Scientists redoing experiments is to ensure that the results are credible.
Yes, global warming is a widely accepted scientific theory supported by a vast majority of climate scientists worldwide. The overwhelming consensus is that human activities, such as the burning of fossil fuels, are a significant driver of the current global warming trend.
Global warming is no longer a theory, as it is accepted as fact by the vast majority of climate scientists.
Yes, global warming is now accepted by the vast majority of climate scientists. It is no longer regarded as a theory but is accepted as true.
One which is accepted by majority
Scientology?
The majority of scientists had collaborators.
the laws which are accepted by majority is a popular law and opposed by majority is called un popular laws.
At the time the country was 90% farms, so the majority of the continental army were farmers.
For a variety of reasons, the majority of the earth's most violent earthquakes and volcanoes occur in these areas
At the time the country was 90% farms, so the majority of the continental army were farmers.
There are scientists that believe in a god and there are scientists that don't. Surveys find that a large majority of scientists do not believe in a god and even fewer believe in a creation account of the world.
If it was published, by a publisher, than it has an ISBN just like all books. However, not every screenplay is published. The majority are not.