Scientists work on different stuff then historians do.
Theories are proven. Hypothesis are ideas.
Theories are educated guesses about what the outcome of something will be. Methods are the actual experiments or research that is carried out to test the theories.
An emerging idea has been examined by a large number of scientists.
Historians typically focus on understanding and interpreting past human events through qualitative analysis, emphasizing context, narrative, and the subjective experiences of individuals. In contrast, scientists tend to rely on empirical evidence and quantitative methods, seeking to formulate and test hypotheses to understand natural phenomena. While historians prioritize the complexity of human behavior and societal changes, scientists often aim for reproducibility and objective conclusions. Both disciplines value critical thinking, but their approaches and methodologies differ significantly.
Mendel called the more common traits "dominant" and the less common ones "recessive."-Sami. (:
Look at them and describe the differences.
Mendel called the more common traits "dominant" and the less common ones "recessive."-Sami. (:
Mendel called the more common traits "dominant" and the less common ones "recessive."-Sami. (:
Scientists work on different stuff then historians do.
How does what differ? This question needs to be rewritten.
work it out you lazy human
Scientific names never differ among scientists.
Historians and scientists approach knowledge and understanding from different perspectives. Historians primarily analyze past events, relying on qualitative methods, primary sources, and interpretive frameworks to construct narratives about human experiences. In contrast, scientists focus on empirical evidence and quantitative methods, seeking to formulate, test, and revise hypotheses about the natural world through experimentation and observation. While both disciplines aim to uncover truths, their methodologies and subject matter differ significantly.
Two rules apply to overloaded methods: 1. The return type of the methods can be different, but the argument lists of overloaded methods must differ. 2. The argument lists of the calling statement must differ enough to allow unambiguous determination of the proper method to call.
Theories are proven. Hypothesis are ideas.
No