A dumb scientist. The only person you should tell if you found somthing worth sharing is the news reporter!
A dumb scientist. The only person you should tell if you found somthing worth sharing is the news reporter!
A dumb scientist. The only person you should tell if you found somthing worth sharing is the news reporter!
Other scientists can use that knowledge - either to confirm or correct a scientist's findings.
Scientists share their findings in various ways:as papers in journals edited by their peersin booksin lectures to students and other scientistsat conferences and meetingsin poster sessionsinformally eg at lunch or dinner
by useing science
A dumb scientist. The only person you should tell if you found somthing worth sharing is the news reporter!
A dumb scientist. The only person you should tell if you found somthing worth sharing is the news reporter!
Other scientists can use that knowledge - either to confirm or correct a scientist's findings.
Scientists first create an hypothesis. They develop methods to prove their hypothesis. In order for other scientists to replicate the findings and prove or disprove another scientist's outcome, the original scientist MUST describe the methods used and the findings.
Vincent Hurst is a professional scientist/inventor who helps people and shares new information with other professional scientists. it is said that he is 1 of 7 professional scientists and inventors.
Scientists share their findings in various ways:as papers in journals edited by their peersin booksin lectures to students and other scientistsat conferences and meetingsin poster sessionsinformally eg at lunch or dinner
by useing science
It is important for scientists to publish their findings to share knowledge with the scientific community, validate their research through peer review, and contribute to the advancement of scientific knowledge. Publishing also allows for transparency and reproducibility of research.
Scientists publish papers in scientific journals or they email other scientists.
Most scientists evaluate research based on its methods, data, and conclusions. They may consider factors like sample size, study design, statistical analysis, and replicability before forming an opinion. Peer review by other scientists is crucial in validating research findings.
In 1665 there was very little science as we know it, so there was not any "findings" . Those who did experiment and create wrote books.
a scientist exploring evidence from other fields of science to support findings