answersLogoWhite

0

The first must be inaccurate because you are sure the second results are correct.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What is the meaning for repeated experiments?

The reason for repeating an experiment is to either verify or disprove the original finding.


What increases the validity of an experiment?

Repeated trials of said experiment.


What should you do if repeated trials give very different results?

If , in the course of your experiment, you run repeated trials with differing results, it is necessary to ensure that only one variable is changing for each experiment. Recheck the data collected for errors.


Why is repitition important in an experiment?

When conducting an experiment, repitition is often a good idea. This is because the data from different repeated trials could well very, meaning that the more repeated trials you have, the more accurate your final data is bound to be.


What well call an experiment that is repeated with the same results?

A reproducible experiment.


What are trials in an experiment?

Trials are the amount of times a certain experiment is repeated.


Which shows that the results of an experiment are reliable?

An experiment in which the results are repeatable....apex


What is the difference between repeatability and reproducibility in scientific experiments?

Repeatability refers to the ability to obtain the same results when an experiment is repeated by the same person using the same methods and equipment. Reproducibility, on the other hand, refers to the ability to obtain consistent results when the experiment is repeated by different people or in different settings.


What is the meaning of getting the same results on repeated trials?

If you repeat the experiment and you get different results, then the accuracy of your first trial is not correct.


What is the significance of a variable during an experiment?

a variable can throw the whole experiment off and will have to be repeated.


Why was Pangaeas hypothesis rejected?

because it obviously had no proof and the same results were not achieved when the experiment was repeated several times by different scientists.


Why was the Pangaea hypothesis rejected?

because it obviously had no proof and the same results were not achieved when the experiment was repeated several times by different scientists.