It is only science if it can be repeated, so yes, experiments do need to be repeatable in order for something to be proven.
The results of the experiment should be comperable if something is to be learned.
To prove accurate results when you are the first to do the experiment.
C. Repeatable
Apex Experimental results are not reliable if they are not repeatable.
An experiment in which the results are repeatable....apex
Yes it is true
I do not know, but I do know that an experiment is a repeatable, practical test of an hypothesis.
C. Repeatable
Repeatable
a control group assures that an experiment will be repeatable
Apex Experimental results are not reliable if they are not repeatable.
An experiment in which the results are repeatable....apex
Yes it is true
I do not know, but I do know that an experiment is a repeatable, practical test of an hypothesis.
My hypothesis was correct when my experiment was done and my data was repeatable.
In scientific terms, "repeatable" means that if you do the same experiment several times, you will get very close to exactly the same results each time.
To be scientifically proven, however for your own observations and interests not really. To make a scientific hypthosis into a fact and eventually a lawyour experiment must be repeatable by other scientists (explorers/pioneers of our world
Your experiment must be able to be repeated so you can conduct multiple trials, thus eliminating errors. It must also be able to be replicated so other scientists can repeat it themselves.
Scientific experiments are supposed to be repeatable. When you are conducting an experiment, you need to fully record your procedure including any equipment, and use diagrams as well so that any scientist can follow your procedure and get the same results that you did.