kinetic energy is zero when the body is at rest.
If at the top of the swing the pendulum is STOPPED then it has zero kinetic energy.
-- If you're talking about a pendulum, then the potential energy is highest and kinetic energy is zero at the ends of the swing, and potential energy is lowest and kinetic energy is highest in the middle of the swing. -- If you're not talking about a pendulum, then the preceding may be completely wrong.
Motion.
The energy of motion is called kinetic energy.
Sitting on the table the stone has potential energy, relative to the ground, of weight times height, mgh. It has zero kinetic energy so its total energy is E = 0 + mgh. When it begins falling it loses potential energy (as it loses height) and gains kinetic energy ( as it picks up speed) so the sum stays the same as initially E = KE + PE = mgh. Just before it hits the ground all of its potential energy is gone and has been transformed into kinetic energy. So the kinetic energy at the bottom (1/2)mv^2 will equal the potential energy at the top.
At 0 Kelvin, all molecular motion stops, so the kinetic energy of the vapor molecules would be zero. Therefore, the kinetic energy of the vapor would be reduced to zero.
When things move. Kinetic energy is energy in motion.
The kinetic energy of the car becomes zero when the car halts. If it halts on top of a hill, the energy changes to potential energy.
We don't think you can. Here's our reasoning: -- Kinetic energy of an object is [(1/2)(mass)(speed)2]. If kinetic energy is not zero, then mass can't be zero, and speed can't be zero either. -- Momentum of the object is [(mass)(speed)]. If mass isn't zero and speed isn't zero, then momentum isn't zero.
No solution. Zero momentum (MV) means either zero mass or zero velocity. Either one results in zero kinetic energy (1/2 MV2).
Momentum = (mass) x (speed) Kinetic Energy = 1/2 (mass) x (speed)2 It looks like the only way a body can have zero momentum is to have either zero mass or else zero speed, and if either of those is zero, then that makes the KE also zero as well, too. So the answer to the question is apparently: no.
This can easily be understood with conservation of energy. Assuming that no energy is lost, potential energy is continuously converted to kinetic energy, and vice versa. At the mean position, the potential energy is zero, therefore the kinetic energy (and hence the velocity) is at maximum.This can easily be understood with conservation of energy. Assuming that no energy is lost, potential energy is continuously converted to kinetic energy, and vice versa. At the mean position, the potential energy is zero, therefore the kinetic energy (and hence the velocity) is at maximum.This can easily be understood with conservation of energy. Assuming that no energy is lost, potential energy is continuously converted to kinetic energy, and vice versa. At the mean position, the potential energy is zero, therefore the kinetic energy (and hence the velocity) is at maximum.This can easily be understood with conservation of energy. Assuming that no energy is lost, potential energy is continuously converted to kinetic energy, and vice versa. At the mean position, the potential energy is zero, therefore the kinetic energy (and hence the velocity) is at maximum.
No. Kinetic energy would be zero in both cases. The book in the higher position has more potential energy.No. Kinetic energy would be zero in both cases. The book in the higher position has more potential energy.No. Kinetic energy would be zero in both cases. The book in the higher position has more potential energy.No. Kinetic energy would be zero in both cases. The book in the higher position has more potential energy.
At 0 Kelvin, the kinetic energy of the vapor would decrease to the minimum possible value as all molecular motion stops. This is known as absolute zero, and at this temperature, particles have minimal movement and consequently have minimal kinetic energy.
A gas, or any matter, would have zero kinetic energy when its temperature reaches absolute zero, zero degrees Kelvin. While such matter is theoretically possible, it has never been observed since any observations of such matter would require some sort of energy transfer, which would be impossible for a substance with zero kinetic energy In practically all these kind of questions the unspoken implication is that we are talking of thermal kinetic energy. Even at absolute zero, there would be kinetic energy due to the earth's rotation, its movement round the sun, the movement of the sun and of the galaxy, whatever that implies about relativity and expansion of space and so on. Even thermal motions have this nasty little hiccup, known as the zero point motion.
actually total energy is the sum of potential energy and kinetic energy....potential energy= -2*kinetic energy . By using this relation you will get that sum of potential and kinetic energy is equal to the magnitude of kinetic energy and it is less than zero...hope this will be enough for you....
Zero.