0
When making a conclusion, scientists analyze the data collected during their experiments and research to determine whether their hypotheses are supported or refuted. They consider the reliability and validity of their findings, often comparing them with existing literature. Additionally, scientists acknowledge limitations and uncertainties in their work, ensuring that conclusions are based on evidence and remain open to future investigation and revision. Ultimately, conclusions contribute to the broader understanding of a scientific topic.
What else can I help you with?
Why scientists often test the conclusion of other scientists?
Scientists do that because they are skeptical about other scientists' work. They do not usually believe what other scientists have concluded, so other scientists come up with a hypothesis (or simply state a question) as to contradict, or theorize why another scientists' work and conclusions are wrong. In short: Scientists are skeptical and do not believe what another scientist has come up with as a conclusion.
What do scientists base their conclusions on?
they based there conclusion on the evidences
How do scientists make their conclusions?
Scientists examine all of the data and try to see what conclusion will fit all of them.
If a hypothesis becomes very well supported scientists may consider it a?
Conclusion.
Which statement best expresses a basic scientific assumption?
If a conclusion is valid, similar investigations by other scientists should result in the same conclusion.
What step are involved in making a conclusion?
Scientists use the data from an experiment to evaluate the hypothesis and draw a valid conclusion.
What steps are involved in making a valid conclusion?
Scientists use the data from an experiment to evaluate the hypothesis and draw a valid conclusion.
Is it important for scientists to state a conclusion?
It is important for scientists to state a conclusion in order to compare their hypothesis to the data that they observed.
Why scientists often test the conclusion of other scientists?
Scientists do that because they are skeptical about other scientists' work. They do not usually believe what other scientists have concluded, so other scientists come up with a hypothesis (or simply state a question) as to contradict, or theorize why another scientists' work and conclusions are wrong. In short: Scientists are skeptical and do not believe what another scientist has come up with as a conclusion.
What is a summary of a scientists' observations?
It would be a conclusion.
What do scientists do after drawing conclusion?
Create A Theory
What is it called when scientists state whether their data confirmed or rejected the hypothesis?
Drawing a conclusion apex
When many scientists reach the same conclusion the conclusion can be called?
A theory. It's not "popular" -_-
What do scientists base their conclusions on?
they based there conclusion on the evidences
How do scientists make their conclusions?
Scientists examine all of the data and try to see what conclusion will fit all of them.
Explain how the scientists arrived at a conclusion regarding the physical characteristics of the Earth?
sfzfdfgdvgbvedgbd
If a hypothesis becomes very well supported scientists may consider it a?
Conclusion.
