0
When scientist try to explain how something in nature works after many observation what do they develop?
When scientists explain how something in nature works after extensive observation, they develop a scientific theory. This theory is a well-substantiated explanation that is based on a body of evidence gathered through experimentation and observation. It helps to unify and interpret various facts and phenomena, providing a framework for further research and understanding.
What else can I help you with?
How do scientist gather information?
Scientists read and communicate with each other to gather information.
In scientific inquiry making an observation typically leads to?
Forming a hypothesis - to explain the observation.
An Attempt to explain observation that has already taken place?
I have no clue
What describes a natural event but does not explain why the event happens?
An observation.
Why would scientist revise older scientific theories?
A theory models or explains why something is the way it is or how something works. If at some point a scientist find this theory to be inadequate (doesn't fully explain/describe it) due to recent research he/she may have done the theory will need to be modified to include the latest discoveries.
How do observations differ from infesrences?
An observation is something you have SEEN, an inference is a logical conclusion drawn to EXPLAIN something you have seen/noticed..
How do scientist gather information?
Scientists read and communicate with each other to gather information.
Why do scientist make scientific models?
They make it so as to explain or study something that cannot be seen with the human eye or something abstract, which needs models to help explain.
How did the scientific view of nature change during the scientifically revolution?
Scientist used abstract reasoning to explain how something happened.
How did the scientific view of natural change during scientific revolution?
Scientist used abstract reasoning to explain how something happened.
How did the scientific nature of nature change during the scientific revolution?
Scientist used abstract reasoning to explain how something happened.
How did the scientific view the nature change during the scientific revolution?
Scientist used abstract reasoning to explain how something happened.
What term describes an observation pattern in nature without any attempt to explain it?
Observation.
In scientific inquiry making an observation typically leads to?
Forming a hypothesis - to explain the observation.
How did the scientific view of nature change nature during the scientific revolution?
Scientist used abstract reasoning to explain how something happened.
Who is he first scientist?
The first known scientist in history is often considered to be Thales of Miletus, a Greek philosopher who lived around 624-546 BC. Thales is known for his contributions to early natural philosophy and for seeking to explain the natural world through reason and observation.
What happens if a hypothesis does not explain an observation?
If a hypothesis does not explain an observation, it may be rejected as a valid explanation for that particular phenomenon. Scientists typically revise or discard hypotheses that fail to account for observed data in order to develop more accurate models and theories. This iterative process helps refine our understanding of the natural world.
