tag them all during the first study
The Nazi government had dehumanized the Jews by constantly portraying them as subhuman animals. (Apex)
Biologists.
conragationistsories
Plants and animals.
Answer: They are raised in a Lab Answer: You cannot conclude that because animals are safer where scientists are that they are ONLY lab animals; it is very possible (and extremely likely in this scenario) that they are wild animals. If the animals are in a lab then safety is moot; their is no need for drawing an inference, there is no danger to the animals. How does this follow? The question has 4 postulates: 1) There is danger to the animals: scientists reduce the danger. You cannot reduce something that doesn't already exist, therefore initial danger has to be > 0. 2) The initial danger is NOT from the scientists: see #1, the scientists augment the existing danger, they are not the originators. 3) In a closed environment there is no external danger to the animals: a controlled environment defies uncontrolled danger; all is controlled. 4) The scientists are not working in a closed environment (lab) - see #2, #3 the scientists are the only source of danger in the lab environment; since by definition there is initial danger besides the scientists there must something not being controlled, BUT a lab is a controlled environment. 5) Inferences are based on incomplete data, generally about environments that are not controllable. QED they are speaking of animals in the wild. You can say it's possible: 1) Animals are safer because they are being watched closely; poachers are less likely to interfere. 2) A change in the environment (the scientists there) can disrupt the predators and more animals are protected from attack by predator. (a numbers game - are 10 antelopes worth bothering one lion?) 3) Diseased animals are more likely to be cured or destroyed (ending the passing of disease) by scientists thereby increasing health of the rest of the herd.
Disturbing wildlife in Antarctica is forbidden by the Antarctic Treaty, agreed to by governments representing 80% of the earth's population. Scientists who study Antarctic animals do so with supreme attention to humane treatment of the animals.
The Nazi government had dehumanized the Jews by constantly portraying them as subhuman animals.
Scientists can use satellite images to asses the conservation status of the endangered animals. They are then able to use the results to find which species are threatened and determine the priority for future protection.
Scientists
Estimating the size of a population of animals can be difficult because animals move around, making them hard to track. Additionally, some animals may be hidden or hard to see in their natural habitat. Counting every individual is often not feasible, so scientists use statistical methods and sampling techniques to estimate population size.
Yes it is becoming a major issue of scientists who are cloning animals and also killing them and also torturing animals and also hitting and animals and these animals are called afzalanians
dinosurs
We call these zoologists.
Zoologists
Often scientists wash animals with plenty of saline and water to get rid of all the oil stuck in the animals' bodies.
no
they learn behavioral patterns of the animals.