0
Those who believe in The Bible find it to be perfectly reliable, and those who believe in science find it to be perfectly reliable; some people find a conflict between science and the bible, while others find that they are not about the same subject matter and therefore do not conflict. You are free to form your own opinion. As for which will prove to be more enduring, it may be that both will endure as long as human civilization will endure, but the future can be difficult to predict.
A careful and critical comparison of science and religion is far too complex a topic, as well as too controversial a topic, for me to attempt it in this particular forum.
What else can I help you with?
Scientist conduct multiple trials of their of their experiment because?
connections academy this is cheating this is your science test! I took the same test
Why is a skeptical attitude important in science?
A skeptical attitude is crucial in science because it encourages critical thinking and questioning of assumptions, leading to more rigorous testing of hypotheses. This mindset helps scientists identify biases, errors, or unsupported claims, ensuring that conclusions are based on reliable evidence. By fostering a culture of skepticism, science can advance more effectively, as findings are continually scrutinized and refined. Ultimately, this approach contributes to the self-correcting nature of scientific inquiry.
How is science more valuable than literature?
It isn't literature is more important than science because without literature science is virtually impossible!
Why is technology important to science?
technology is important to science, because it helps the numbers in science come out more accurate and easier.
Why do the science is interesting subject?
i think you need to concentrate on english more than science.
What are synonyms for a fair test in science?
More Reliable
What is the difference between the bible and science book which is more accurate to believe?
The bible tells the truth and everybody should read the bible and believe in it. The science book has ecological answers.
Which translation, the NIV or the NKJV, is considered more accurate and reliable for studying the Bible?
Both the NIV and the NKJV are widely respected translations of the Bible, but the NKJV is generally considered to be more accurate and reliable for studying the Bible due to its commitment to preserving the original wording and structure of the text.
Must the facts about science agree with the Bible?
There is no real requirement for science to agree with the words of the Bible, or even for the Bible to literally agree with modern science. Stephen Jay Gould explained this when he said that the domain or magisterium for science is the empirical realm - what the universe is made from and why it works the way it does. The magisterium of religion includes the ultimate meaning and moral values. These magisteria are nonoverlapping - science does not comment on the ultimate meaning of life, while religion should not comment on the natural world.At times the Bible does disagree with the facts of science, which makes Stephen Jay Goud's recommendation more significant for Christians. For more information on this, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/when-science-challenges-the-bible
Name the scientist who has produced more work on the bible than natural science he is remembered for today?
Jesus.
Does Scientology has a Bible and did they believe that Jesus is your savior?
No they don't believe in Jesus. They believe more in science, in astrology.
Is the king James Bible more reliable than the study Bibles?
Study Bibles come in most translations of the Bible, including the King James Version, and are not a translation in themselves. They have notes and information to complement, illuminate, and expand upon the text of the Bible.
What is the more reliable source 72 books of the Catholic Bible or the 66 books of the Bible?
"Reliability" is a function of the translation, not the function of whether certain books are included or not. "Reliability" might also depend on what particular aspect of the Bible you were concerned with at a given time.
Is enduring an adverb or an adjective?
The word enduring is the present participle of the verb to endure. The present participle is also an adjective and a gerund (verbal noun). Examples: Verb: After enduring a series of treatments, the boy is finally in recovery. Adjective: The novel 'To Kill a Mockingbird' is an enduring favorite. Noun: Enduring is more difficult but enduring pays benefits; giving up pays nothing.
What is the average weight for a 5' 4'' 17-year-old?
go to this page, bmi is a much more reliable science: http://www.nhlbisupport.com/bmi/
Scientist conduct multiple trials of their of their experiment because?
connections academy this is cheating this is your science test! I took the same test
If science contradicts with the Bible then Science is wrong Agree or Disagree?
Depends upon whether one believes in the scientific creation or the biblical creation. No definitive answer can be achieved as to who is right or wrong. It also depends whether you believe in a naturalistic philosophy behind the science or whether you will interpret the facts according to pure science without such philosophy. Scientific facts do not speak for themselves nor can science make conclusions about something such as the Bible which is not a scientific document (this makes no statement about whether the Bible is true or not). If science is made to contradict the Bible then it has ceased to be science but is a philosophy. Science, as such does not and cannot contradict the Bible. Separate answer: Occasionally Science and the Bible do differ, but you can see that the Bible agrees with modern Science on several interesting points! Such as Job 26:7 Which says "...the Earth which is hanging upon nothing..." this was back when people believed the Earth was on the back of a giant animal, or some type of mythological "god". (Also see Isaiah 40:22 "...circle of the Earth...") So it's plain to see that the Bible is the inspired word of God, and if something in science contradicts the Bible, I believe the Bible would always be in the right. For more information you can go to www.watchtower.org ^^ The bible rarely is in line with science. There are several ways in which it is flat out wrong.. Let's list some examples, shall we? 1.) The age of the earth 2.) Evolution 3.) The animal food chain 4.) The diets of certain animals. 5.) Mathematics 6.) Weather 7.) Whether animals can talk or not 8.) The existence of mud people 9.) Virgin birth 10.) Zombies 11.) The heliocentric universe 12.) Dinosaurs etc
