Put simply, it doesn't. There really is no other reason, any archaeologist, paleontologist, geologist, or other professional in a field of artifact study will tell you that there is no "line" of creatures leading up to today's animals. For example humanoid skeletons where found conspicuously at the beginning of the Cambrian period and at no time before then, the only explanation for this is that an unaccounted for variable such as a "supernatural force" was present and not noticed
Common bone structure and density can show relations between species
It simply highly suggests that all organisms going through this developmental phase have common ancestry, thus are related on the tree of life.
limbs wings legs arms and flippers
Simularities in DNA sequence
That evidence is homologous. Shared common ancestry. In this case you could trace this homology back as far as the common ancestor of gorillas and hominid fossils, or as far back as the emergence of all tetrapods.
Of common ancestry, though ontogeny does not recapitulate phylogeny, ontogeny, development, can create phylogeny.
The strong evidence for the common ancestry of all vertebrates is THE SIMILARITY OF THEIR EMBRYOLOGICAL STAGES.
The DNA genetic code provides the best evidence of the common ancestry of life. Science has shown that there are many similarities between DNA sequences.
It does hint at common ancestry so it is "evidence" of evolution.
Simularities in DNA sequence
It simply highly suggests that all organisms going through this developmental phase have common ancestry, thus are related on the tree of life.
Many of their genes are the same.
If organisms have similar genes, then they are closely related.
fossil evidence :)
limbs wings legs arms and flippers
That different organisms are able to adapt to the same environment.
I do not know. I can look at shared biochemical pathways and see direct evidence of common ancestry with other organisms.
Fossil evidence