0
Which of the follwing statements is true about negligence as it applies toa certifying officer?
A Certifying Officer is presumed negligent when there is a fiscal irregularity
What else can I help you with?
What term in science applies to a widely accepted explanatory idea that is broad in scope and supported by a large body of evidence?
A set of statements or principles devised to explain a group of facts or phenomena is called a theory.
What is the definition for vise versa?
What applies to something, applies the same way to the other. Or, what applies to one thing, applies the opposite way to another. Doubts see the context.
A person who applies for a job?
applicant
Which science mainly applies to crash dynamics?
PHISICS
Which terms applies to this situation?
You have not described any situation. I guess the applicable term must be, what?
Which is TRUE about negligence as it applies to a Certifying Officer?
Certifying Officer is presumed negligent when there is a fiscal irregularity.
What statement is TRUE about negligence as it applies to a Certifying Officer?
A Certifying Officer is presumed negligent when there is a fiscal irregularity
What is TRUE about negligence as it applies to a Certifying Officer?
A Certifying Officer is presumed negligent when there is a fiscal irregularity
An automatic presumption of pecuniary liability applies to?
Certifying Officers and Dispursing Officers
What is it called when all or part of the damages may have been caused by the behavior or action of the plaintiff?
This is known as contributory negligence or comparative negligence. Contributory negligence applies when the plaintiff's own actions contributed to their injuries, potentially barring them from recovering any damages. Comparative negligence, on the other hand, allows for a partial recovery based on the degree of fault attributed to the plaintiff.
A country has a capitalist economy. Which of the following statements applies to it?
Companies compete with each other for business.
What is the legal definition of negligence and how does it apply in cases of personal injury?
Negligence is a legal concept that refers to the failure to exercise reasonable care, resulting in harm or injury to another person. In cases of personal injury, negligence applies when a person or entity breaches their duty of care, causing harm to another individual. To prove negligence in a personal injury case, the injured party must show that the defendant owed a duty of care, breached that duty, and that the breach directly caused the injury.
What is vanishing company?
vanishing companies applies to companies which cease to file their statements of return or, where, after raising capital, the whereabouts of their registered office or directors aren't known.
A country has a command economy. Which of the following statements applies to it?
The government owns and controls all major industries-apex
What is gross neglect of duty?
Gross negligence is a legal concept which means serious carelessness. Negligence is the opposite of diligence, or being careful. The standard of ordinary negligence is what conduct one expects from the proverbial "reasonable person". By analogy, if somebody has been grossly negligent, that means they have fallen so far below the ordinary standard of care that one can expect, to warrant the label of being "gross".
What phobia is the fear of stories myths or false statements?
I wouldn't label it as a phobia, I'd label a fear of being lied to as 'trust issues'.
What is Georgia's last clear chance rule under its comparative negligence laws?
Nothing in this post constitutes legal advice. Georgia generally applies a modified comparative negligence approach in apportioning fault in negligence actions. A plaintiff can recover his damages from a negligent defendant discounted by the plaintiff's percentage of fault; however, when the plaintiff's fault is greater than the defendant's the plaintiff cannot recover. So, where a plaintiff's injuries amount to $100,000, and the plaintiff is found to be 30% at fault and the defendant 70%, the plaintiff can recover in the amount of $70,000. If the plaintiff were 51% at fault and the defendant 49%, the plaintiff would recover nothing. Although Last Clear Chance is a doctrine more commonly associated with contributory negligence jurisdictions (where any negligence on the part of the plaintiff is a complete bar to recovery), Georgia preserves it and applies it both to the plaintiff and the defendant. Notwithstanding the comparative negligence rule discussed above, if a plaintiff, through the exercise of reasonable care, could have avoided the consequences of the defendant's prior negligence but failed to do so, he will be completely barred from recovery, regardless of the defendant's percentage of fault. Conversely, even though a plaintiff's negligence contributes to the incident, if the defendant had the last clear chance to avoid harm, but failed to do so because he did not exercise reasonable care, the defendant can be held liable to the full extent of plaintiff's damages (i.e., not discounted for plaintiff's degree of fault).
