A Certifying Officer is presumed negligent when there is a fiscal irregularity
A Certifying Officer is presumed negligent when there is a fiscal irregularity.
A set of statements or principles devised to explain a group of facts or phenomena is called a theory.
What applies to something, applies the same way to the other. Or, what applies to one thing, applies the opposite way to another. Doubts see the context.
applicant
PHISICS
You have not described any situation. I guess the applicable term must be, what?
Certifying Officer is presumed negligent when there is a fiscal irregularity.
A Certifying Officer is presumed negligent when there is a fiscal irregularity
A Certifying Officer is presumed negligent when there is a fiscal irregularity
Certifying Officers and Dispursing Officers
This is known as contributory negligence or comparative negligence. Contributory negligence applies when the plaintiff's own actions contributed to their injuries, potentially barring them from recovering any damages. Comparative negligence, on the other hand, allows for a partial recovery based on the degree of fault attributed to the plaintiff.
Companies compete with each other for business.
vanishing companies applies to companies which cease to file their statements of return or, where, after raising capital, the whereabouts of their registered office or directors aren't known.
The government owns and controls all major industries-apex
Gross negligence is a legal concept which means serious carelessness. Negligence is the opposite of diligence, or being careful. The standard of ordinary negligence is what conduct one expects from the proverbial "reasonable person". By analogy, if somebody has been grossly negligent, that means they have fallen so far below the ordinary standard of care that one can expect, to warrant the label of being "gross".
I wouldn't label it as a phobia, I'd label a fear of being lied to as 'trust issues'.
Georgia's last clear chance rule in its comparative negligence laws states that even if the plaintiff's negligence contributed to the accident, the defendant can still be held liable if they had the last clear chance to avoid the accident but failed to do so. This rule allows the plaintiff to recover damages even if they were partially at fault.
Normally, renter's coverage applies only to the contents of the dwelling (furniture, for example). In contrast, homeowner's coverage is much broader. It applies to the structure of the dwelling, contents, and typically has an element of liability coverage that provides protection to the insured in case a guest is injured, because of the insured's negligence, upon the insured premises.