A question that can be tested in a scientific manner is, "Does increasing the amount of sunlight exposure improve the growth rate of tomato plants?" This question is specific and measurable, allowing for controlled experiments where different groups of tomato plants receive varying amounts of sunlight. Researchers can track growth rates over time and analyze the data to draw conclusions about the relationship between sunlight exposure and plant growth.
This questions borders on jibberish. Could you rephrase it, please?
This question does not need scientific inquiry.
the term law is rarely applied anymore in science. it used to be used to refer to theories so well tested that no reasonable person could reasonably doubt their validity.
A hypothesis is considered falsifiable if it can be tested and potentially proven false through observation or experimentation. This means there must be a possible outcome or evidence that could contradict the hypothesis. Falsifiability is a key criterion in the scientific method, as it allows for hypotheses to be subjected to empirical scrutiny, ensuring they can be validated or refuted based on evidence. If a hypothesis cannot be tested or disproven, it falls outside the realm of scientific inquiry.
A hypothesis is an eduacted guess, and a guess has no previous knowledge about it.A hypothesis is usually part of a scientific experiment which involves a method for testing the hypothesis, and either supporting it, or supporting the opposite, the null hypothesis.
This questions borders on jibberish. Could you rephrase it, please?
Could you ask the question in a different manner? This question is too vague.
Could you please provide the question you'd like me to answer?
One scientific question about butterflies could be: How do butterflies navigate during migration over long distances?
This question does not need scientific inquiry.
Yes, almost any question can be investigated though scientific inquiry.
If I understand the question correctly, ALL of them can change...In principal. That is, a scientific law could be proved false, though it is the most tested of theories and least likely to be changed. That is the beauty of science. Nothing is beyond question. Let's review a layman definition of these terms: Hypothesis --> Reasonable, but not fully tested, guess to answer a question. Theory --> A fully tested hypothesis that's been checked by others to a question. Law --> A theory that's been around a while that no one can find fault with. Experiment --> Logical process to test a hypothesis...They are changed ALL the time.
How does that work or why does that work could be beginning questions.
of the following is a scientific question you could ask about shoes
the term law is rarely applied anymore in science. it used to be used to refer to theories so well tested that no reasonable person could reasonably doubt their validity.
Scientific theories base on facts depending on the observation made while hypothesis is a tentative answer or solution to a given problem. In other words, theory is all about possible facts but they may not always be true and hypothesis, is an intelligent answer to a particular scientific problem.
It seems your question is incomplete. Could you please provide more context or clarify what you would like to know?