microevolution can lead to macroevolution
Without know what statements you are referring to we cannot answer.
natural selection!
There were no statements included. Asking multiple choice test questions usually doesn't work so well.
It is real and may have physical effects
Oh, dude, if "jkl mnp," then the statements that must be true are probably the ones that make sense in the context of "jkl mnp." I mean, it's like saying if the sky is blue, then the grass is green, right? So, like, just look at the situation and use some good old common sense to figure out which statements are true.
Microevolution can lead to Microevolution
Microevolution refers to small-scale changes in gene frequencies within a population over generations, while macroevolution involves large-scale evolutionary changes that lead to the formation of new species. Both processes are driven by genetic variation, natural selection, and other evolutionary mechanisms. Microevolution is the basis for macroevolution, as accumulated small changes can eventually result in the divergence of distinct species.
No, genetic drift is an example of microevolution.
Microevolution is not part of macroevolution. Microevolution involves small-scale changes within a species over a shorter period of time, while macroevolution involves larger scale changes that lead to the formation of new species over a longer period of time.
Described by the definition for evolution. Evolution is the change in allele frequency over time in a population of organisms.The prefered terms are evolution ( instead of microevolution ) and speciation ( instead of macroevolution ).
Microevolution refers to small-scale changes in a population's gene pool over a few generations, resulting in adaptations within a species. Macroevolution, on the other hand, involves large-scale evolutionary changes leading to the formation of new species over longer periods of time. Both processes are driven by the same mechanisms of genetic variation and natural selection.
Given the opportunity for reproductive isolation between subpopulations to develop, macroevolution seems like an inevitable consequence of microevolution. Not only can speciation occur (and not only is it observed): it's hard to imagine how it could not occur.
The terms macroevolution and microevolution were first coined in 1927 by the Russian entomologist Philipchenko. Macroevolution is the term now used to refer to any evolutionary change at or above the level of species, such as the splitting of a species into two or the change of a species over time into another species. Microevolution refers to any evolutionary change below the level of species, and can also apply to changes that are not genetic.Creationists often assert that macroevolution is not proven, even if microevolution is, apparently meaning that whenever evolution is observed it is microevolution, never macroevolution. These claims are considered a misuse of authentic scientific terms. Macro Evolution is a theory; it is also a fact.For more information, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation
Microevolution and Macroevolution : NovaNet
Macroevolution is just lots of small steps of microevolution. With many small steps a species can change so much it cannot breed with its unchanged former kin, and then it's considered a new species. If microevolution is considered seconds, macroevolution is minutes or hours. Acknowledging one exists is recognizing the other, too. ^^
Sure! An example of microevolution would be the change in wing color of a population of butterflies over several generations due to natural selection. On the other hand, an example of macroevolution would be the development of a new species from a population of organisms over millions of years, such as the evolution of whales from land-dwelling mammals.
Microevolution is small evolutionary changes. Macroevolution is change above the specie level. Biologists debate if this process even exists. Some say they are fundamentally the same thing. It seems that macroevolution is the evolution of evolution. That sounds complicated.