0
If I'm not mistaken the Law of Use and Disuse was disproved by August Weisman (scientist) several years after the death of Darwin (late 1800's). Weisman thought that if the law of use and disuse was true, he could prove it by cutting off the tails of mice for 20 generations in a row. No matter how many mice he cut the tail off of, the babies were born with a tail. His experiment proved that the law of use and disuse was false.
What else can I help you with?
Was lamarck's theory accepted or rejected?
His theory of use and disuse was rejected.
Why is lamarck's theory not supported by the theory of natural selection?
Lamarck thought that traits organisms acquired during their lifetime would be passed on to offspring. He believed that traits were determined by use or disuse. However, acquired traits cannot be passed on to offspring; only traits determined by DNA can
If anytime a scientific theory is challenged does it mean its not a good theory?
No. It simply means that someone thinks that there may be a different explanation. It is quite possible that the person challenging the scientific theory is wrong.Moreover, although Einstein disproved some of Newton's theories, we continue to use them because they are accurate enough for normal circumstances and are simpler to apply.
What scientific laws or theories have been proven wrong?
AnswerThese are a few scientific theories - most of which differ from modern theories in that they were philosophy- or religion-based ideas, with little real evidence, rather than scientific experiment and thought - that have been proved wrong throughout history. Flat Earth hypothesis. NOT A SCIENTIFIC THEORY (DOGMA) Disproved by Eratosthenes around 200 BCPhlogiston theory. Created to explain the processes of oxidation - corrosion and combustion - it was disproved by discovery of the fact that combustion is the reaction of fuel with oxygen and that corrosion is caused by oxidation of metals and the formation of compounds. Disproved by Antoine-Laurent Lavoisier 1780Geocentric theory of the solar system. NOT A SCIENTIFIC THEORY (DOGMA) Disproved by Nicolas Copernicus around 1500 ADThe classical elemental theory (that all substance is made of earth, air, fire and water). Disproved by the discovery of subatomic particles and the modern elements, as we know them today.Aristotle's dynamic motion. It was an attempt at explaining momentum and why certain substances behave in certain ways; it was linked to the concept of the classical elements. Disproved by Galileo around 1600Ether as a carrier of light waves and radio waves. hypothesis, never a THEORY. Disproved by the Michelson-Morley experiment 1887Newton's corpuscular theory of light. While correct in many ways - it was the modern concept of the photon - it too was supplanted by the dual wave-particle theory of light that explains all aspects of it. I want to give credit for this one to Louis de Broglie 1929Newtons Laws of Motion. Still highly respected and ubiquitously used they were 'improved upon' by the Theory of Relativity by Albert Einstein 1940Spontaneous Generation That living things were spontaneously created from other biological material, as bee from flowers or flies from decaying flesh. Disproved by Francesco Redi 1668.Lamarckian Evolution That the phenotype of living thing was determined by their exertions during life. Displace by Natural Selection, George Wallace and Charles Darwin around 1800The Age of the Earth as calculated by Lord Kelvin. Corrected by Ernest Rutherford with the discovery of radioactive decay around 1930Ideal Gas Law. Never regarded as a true law as no gas ever behaved ideally. A working standard only. Invented with the understanding of its limited use. Emile Clapeyron 1834
Why is it that lamarck's suggestion that organisms arise spontaneously and then become increasingly more complex is not supported by the theory of natural selection?
Because lamarck thought that traits organisms aquired during their lifetime would be passed on to offspring. He believed that traits were determined by use or disuse. However, aquired traits cannot be passed on to offspring, only traits determined by DNA can.
How do you explain the theory of use and disuse?
Explain the theory of use and disuse
Was lamarck's theory accepted or rejected?
His theory of use and disuse was rejected.
What idea proposed by Lamrack was later found incorrect?
Use and Disuse Theory
Who propose use and disuse theory?
The use and disuse theory was proposed by Jean-Baptiste Lamarck, a French naturalist, in the early 19th century. Lamarck suggested that organisms could pass on traits acquired during their lifetime to their offspring. This theory contrasted with Darwin's theory of natural selection and is now largely discredited.
Who was the scientist who came up with the theory of use and disuse?
Jean-Baptise de Lamarck (french)
Whose theory was that organisms can modify their bodies through the use or disuse of parts and that these modifications can be passed on to their offsprings?
Part of Lamark's theory.
What is the base of lamarck theory?
The two concepts of the inheritance of acquired characteristics plus use and disuse of traits.
Example of disuse theory under retention?
Disuse theory in memory retention suggests that information which is not rehearsed or practiced over time will fade away from memory. For example, if a person learns a new language but does not use it regularly, they may forget the vocabulary and grammar rules due to disuse. This theory highlights the importance of continuous practice and application in order to retain information in memory.
The theory of use and disuse?
The theory of use and disuse of Jean-Baptiste Lamarck, advocated the idea that animals acquired characteristics after using certain physical traits constantly. For example, he believed that the reason why the necks of giraffes were long was because they stretched to reach leaves on high trees. By the same logic, the lack of a human tail could be explained by the fact that humans did not use it. This idea is not correct, however, it advanced evolutionary theory!
Who proposed that organisms acquired or lost traits during their lifetime by selective use or disuse of organs?
Jean-Baptiste Lamarck was the scientist who proposed the theory of acquired characteristics, suggesting organisms could acquire or lose traits during their lifetime through the use or disuse of certain organs. This theory was later replaced by Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection.
Has Lamarck's theory of evolution been proved?
Scientists do not prove things. Lamarck's theory is long refuted as acquired characteristics and the use and disuse concepts are not explanations for evolution of populations.
What is the explanation for the law of use and disuse?
The law of use and disuse, proposed by Jean-Baptiste Lamarck, suggests that organs in an organism's body will develop with increased use and deteriorate with disuse. This theory has been largely discredited in evolutionary biology, as traits are now understood to be inherited through genetic information rather than acquired through individual actions during an organism's lifetime.
