In a learning context, both Bruce and Olena can gain insights from the experiment, regardless of whose hypothesis was proven false. If Bruce's hypothesis was incorrect, he may learn valuable information about the factors influencing temperature change, which can deepen his understanding. Olena, on the other hand, may also learn from the experimental process and the outcome, reinforcing the idea that science is about exploration and discovery, not just validation of initial beliefs. Ultimately, the learning experience can be rich for both individuals, as each contributes to the overall understanding of the topic.
No, the hypothesis is the question about the experiment. The conclusion is the sum up of what was learned from an experiment.
A good hypothesis is determined by: Use of what you learned and what you know to infer the happenings. Also, if you have good reason to your inferences. Try to put at least 3 or 4 good reasons in. If the reasons make sense, and they are possibly correct, or close to it, you should have a pretty well built hypothesis.
some information; the data still provide valuable information about the hypothesis
It could point to that the hypothesis was wrong.
The conclusion is what u learned and how your hypothesis is right or wrong
No, the hypothesis is the question about the experiment. The conclusion is the sum up of what was learned from an experiment.
There is no difference
A good hypothesis is determined by: Use of what you learned and what you know to infer the happenings. Also, if you have good reason to your inferences. Try to put at least 3 or 4 good reasons in. If the reasons make sense, and they are possibly correct, or close to it, you should have a pretty well built hypothesis.
some information; the data still provide valuable information about the hypothesis
some information; the data still provide valuable information about the hypothesis
First you need a purpose. The purpose should start with the purpose if my investigation is. Next is the hypothesis. The hypothesis has to have if, then, and because. Then is your materials and procedure. After that, you have to collect the data. Then there is the anaylisis. The anaylisis has to have I learned that. Finally, there is the conclusion. It has to have four sentences. I learned that, my hypothesis was..., my hypothesis was correct or incorrect, and next time I will.
It could point to that the hypothesis was wrong.
idont no
The conclusion is what u learned and how your hypothesis is right or wrong
Results from a test. What you learned from the test/what you found, what was tested, hypothesis, etc.
A testable hypothesis could be: "Individuals who identify as homosexual will exhibit consistent patterns of brain activity in response to sexual stimuli compared to heterosexual individuals, supporting the hypothesis of a biological basis for sexual orientation."
scientific inquiry consists of : observing, asking questions, forming a hypothesis, gathering data, testing the hypothesis, and sharing what has been learned. :)