As I know the saying, it came from Thomas Aquinas. The original quote was not about 'understanding' but about religious belief, specifically "faith." The original quote is, "To one who has faith, no explanation is necessary. To one without faith, no explanation is possible." Great quotes like this often get twisted and 'massaged' to fit the borrower's purpose.
I've seen it attributed to Stuart Chase, Franz Werfel, Joseph Dunninger and Thomas Aquinas.
I haven't yet found anything definitive that links it to any of the above (but I'm working on it).
The Aquinas paraphrase is:
"Unbelievers are in ignorance of things that are of faith, for neither do they see or know them in themselves, nor do they know them to be credible. The faithful, on the other hand, know them, not as by demonstration, but by the light of faith which makes them see that they ought to believe them, as stated above." (Summa Theologiae II-II, Q. 1, Art. 5, reply obj. 1)
And some people suggest that it comes from Stuart Chase's 1925 book 'The Tragedy of Waste' - but it doesn't.
I'll keep looking.
The answer is: it's good old "Anonymous".
See quoteinvestigator [dot] com/2020/08/07/believer/ for details.
jhhj
Enviroskeptics are those who oppose the claims of environmentalists or environment scientists. Explanation: According to the enviroskeptics
Basic, important, central, crucial, major, necessary, vital, or significant. Those a synonyms for fundamental.
no to some people, but to those who wish to understand the world and everything in it, it's the best tool (of the mind) that we have.
Nothing is happening that contradicts the laws of nature. But sometimes things occur that we don't quite understand how. Those might look like they're contradicting the laws of nature until We understand them.
"To one who has faith, no explanation is necessary. To one without faith, no explanation is possible." ― St. Thomas Aquinas
Kerry Orr, 25th Infantry Division, 1/27th Wolfhounds Vietnam 68-69
St. Augustine. but not about "me" but "God".
teach necessary things and explanation to those people who don't know how to understand
Yes I do.To those who believe, no explanation is necessary.To those who do not believe, no explanation is possible.
You write down the facts/observation you have and what those. You then come up with an possible explanation for what the facts/observations tell you . Following that you describe what you will do to test the validity of your explanation.
Give any supporting facts, opinions, or reasons. When giving an explanation, keep these questions in mind. Who? What? When? Where? Why? How? Answer as many of those as possible, and you should have a pretty solid answer.
There really are no details to it. A "crime" consists of only two things: (1) a criminal act accompanied by (2) a criminal intent. Those are the only two things necessary. If one of those two elements is missing or cannot be proven, then no crime has occurred.
0 and 1. There are only 10 types of people. Those that understand binary and those that do not! If you do not understand that sentence you do not understand binary.
You use "his or her" when referring to a singular, gender-neutral subject to indicate belonging or possession. "Their" is used when referring to a plural subject or when the gender of the subject is unknown or irrelevant.
Jargon is terminology used in a particular profession, only understood by those in that profession. Jargon can often be used outside of its given audience, provided an explanation is used to clarify its meaning.
when designing a structure, its important to utilize the land as it exists. Also, you must understand the best ingress and egress to the property when deciding how the building will be oriented. Lastly, it might be necessary to design the shape of the building around a necessary landscape element such as roads, sidewalks, existing trees, ect. It is similar to engineering concepts...architects don't need to be experts in engineering or landscapes, but they certainly need to understand the concepts when dealing with professionals in those areas.