His theory of use and disuse was rejected.
That organisms pass on traits acquired in their lifetimes. It was rejected in favour of Darwinian evolution, in which species and not individuals evolve, but Larmarckism is valid to a point where epigenetics is concerned.
The answer to the question why is this: It can be rejected at a later date because it is falsifiable in nature if it is a good hypothesis. If you meant to ask HOW it can be rejected, the answer is by way of further experimentation that rules out some or all of the hypothesis as stated.
True
It can be rejected if there is no control variable.
The apocrypha was NOT included in the Bible. These are the books rejected by Jews who cannonized the scriptures.
His theory of use and disuse was rejected.
Charles Darwin rejected the Scriptures (Bible) and came up with evolution. Pierre-Louis Moreau believed that the Earth was flat. Maupertuis believed we got here by "lucky chance". These are some of the many that believe on evolution. (Hopefully you aren't one of them.)
That organisms pass on traits acquired in their lifetimes. It was rejected in favour of Darwinian evolution, in which species and not individuals evolve, but Larmarckism is valid to a point where epigenetics is concerned.
That organisms pass on traits acquired in their lifetimes. It was rejected in favour of Darwinian evolution, in which species and not individuals evolve, but Larmarckism is valid to a point where epigenetics is concerned.
Among the general public the percentage varies by nation. A survey of 18 developed nations found majority support among 16 of them, over 80% in several. The U.S. was second to last, evenly split on the issue. Turkey was the only nation on the list where more than half of the population rejected evolution. About 99.85% of professional biologists and about 97% of scientists in general. The National Academy of Science of almost every nation on Earth has issued one or more official statements in support evolution.
Yes, a scientific theory can be rejected if new evidence or observations contradict its predictions or if a more accurate theory is developed. The rejection of a theory is an essential part of the scientific process that helps refine our understanding of the natural world.
Early man scholars rejected fossils as a means to trace human evolution because they held religious or cultural beliefs that contradicted the idea of human evolution. Additionally, fossils were not well understood or widely accepted as evidence of human ancestry at the time.
While the NIV bible has been approved by Catholics the Baptist have rejected this version, and have denounced the use of it. Largely due to changing to gender-neutral and changing scriptures from original translation.
Fundamentalists were Protestant believers who strongly resisted liberal Protestantism's attempts to adapt doctrines to Darwinian evolution and biblical criticism. They believed in a literal interpretation of the Bible and rejected the idea of evolution and critical scholarship of the Bible.
The Lord instructed his disciples at great length, letting them know the price for following him. They were prepared to be martyrs and none shirked from their fate. Numerous scriptures in the New Testament show this.
it was not rejected.