It doesn't actually rise, so much as it does float on top of cold air.
Think of it this way: If someone was floating in a pool, and we poured more water in the pool, did that person rise? They didn't actually do anything other than float there.
Heat is the same way. It's not actively moving when it "rises".
well, i think both would be correct, though a "bad conductor of heat" would be better. Or you could say "insulator for heat" or simply insulator....
A house burns up (heat rises) but they say it burns down. A figure of speech.
It is incorrect to say that heavy objects sink in water because... A big slab of wood is heavy, right? Wood floats. For one example.
Because in science, cold doesn't exist. You can't make cold, you can only remove heat. But in human language we've made words to describe the absences too. Dark is the absence of light. Cold is the absence of heat. Vacuum is the absence of all material. So insulation can't keep the cold out, since the cold doesn't exist. What you can do though is keep the heat in. Heat is a real thing. You can make heat.
It depends on what the container is made of. Say it was made of tin and was a hot day, the water would become hot because the tin would heat up and the water would steal the heat energy because it is cooler.
It is incorrect to say that "heat rises" because heat does not have mass or volume to physically move in a specific direction. Heat transfer occurs from hot to cold areas due to the movement of thermal energy, known as convection, which leads to the misconception of heat "rising."
It is incorrect to say that an object "contains" heat because heat is not a tangible substance that can be stored within an object. Heat is a form of energy that can be transferred between objects or systems. When we say an object is hot, we actually mean that it has a higher internal energy due to the transfer of heat to it.
It is incorrect to say that an object has heat because heat is not a property that an object possesses; rather, it is the transfer of energy between objects due to a temperature difference. Objects can store thermal energy, but they do not "have" heat in the same way they have mass or volume.
"The crowd cheered the winners, her and me." It is incorrect in this context to say "she and I" and it is always incorrect to say "her and I." You can use "her and me" anywhere that you would use "us," and you can use "she and I" anywhere that you would use "we."
Logic tells me it is not correct since "suffice" is a synonym of sufficient. You would never say "sufficient it to say" would you. So why say "suffice it to say"?
This depends on the context. You might say "Does yourmother want a drink?" or "Do your homework" but to switch them would be incorrect.
To be incorrect is avoir faute
this question is grammatically incorrect, but i would say it is about 80lbs worth.
you cannot say "he have" this is incorrect, it is " he has"
Yes it is. It would be more polite to say something to the effect of "he/she suffers from epilepsy".
An incorrect way to say "I do not know." You would usually use nescio.
Massachusetts I would say. The sun "rises" in the East.