He didn't, that's why only accepting evolution as the only option of how the heck we are here is irrational
____
Darwin was a scientist and as such understood that theories evolve as more information comes to light. He knew he didn't have all the evidence and as more came to light his theories would change accordingly. He was building on the work of others who came before him and knew later scientists would contribute their unique insights.
People think that the theory of evolution is a closed book with nothing else to contribute. And because the theory doesn't explain every single aspect of evolution, and that there are gaps in our current knowledge, that it is completely wrong. Science is alive, it changes and updates with new knowledge.
inherited variation
Darwin realized that Malthus's theory of population control could be generalized to any population of organisms.
After collecting specimens from many areas of the world, Darwin noted the similarities in them. He discovered that new kinds of species could gradually grow into new ones over years.
Darwin believed that organisms evolved due to natural selection. Whereas Lanmark suggested that the characteristics acquired during an organisms life i.e. academic ability, could be passed to the next generation.
The Theory of Actualism, which was put forward by Hutton, helped Charles Darwin in his research as he studied evolution of fossils. Darwin's work was also influenced by many other geologists apart from Hutton.
This questions borders on jibberish. Could you rephrase it, please?
Darwin's observations regarding ostriches led him to the theory of Evolution. For example, when he visited one part of Argentina, he noticed that the ostriches were similar, not the same, to ostriches from another region of Argentina. The fossil record also mimicked this loosely. Thus, Darwin began to look for a viable theory that could answer this. Hence, the theory of Evolution was born, which made the scientific explanation for life as we know it today. I hope this answers your question.
He did not influence Darwin and Darwin did not know who he was. Darwin's ' blending theory of inheritance ' was wrong and though Darwin did not particularly like the theory he could think of nothing better to explain inheritance. There is a legend that Darwin had a copy of Mendel's work in his desk but could not read it because it was in German. Just a legend, though.
Darwin realized that Malthus's theory of population control could be generalized to any population of organisms.
Darwin's observations regarding ostriches led him to the theory of Evolution. For example, when he visited one part of Argentina, he noticed that the ostriches were similar, not the same, to ostriches from another region of Argentina. The fossil record also mimicked this loosely. Thus, Darwin began to look for a viable theory that could answer this. Hence, the theory of Evolution was born, which made the scientific explanation for life as we know it today. I hope this answers your question.
Charles Darwin is the founder, or creator, of the theory of natural selection. The co-founder could be considered Alfred Russel Wallace.
You can easily refute the theory of evolution--just as easily as you can refute Newton's theory of gravity, or Einstein's theory of relativity. You just can't refute these theories using science or evidence with ease, as these theories are extremely well supported. If you could confirm the existence of fossil bunnies in undisturbed Cambrian strata, that would serve as excellent evidence of a fundamental flaw in Darwin's theory. If you could find a natural specie such as Kirk Cameron's crocaduck, evolution could not explain such a chimera, and forces at odds with Darwin's theory would obviously be at play.
how
Darwin did not know the mechanism for heredity, and in particular, could not explain how a favorable mutation could become widespread in a species.Mendel's work later explained this to the scientist in the 1900s
Darwin's theory, which is no longer just Darwin's, is the bedrock on which the modern discipline of biology rests. All the disparate observations that naturalists made up to the time of Darwin suddenly had explanations. The species problem, how species arise, was, basically solved. Predictions from the theory could now be made and tested, just as they are made and tested today. " Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. " Dobzanski
teach about Darwin's theory of evolution
Darwin's observations regarding ostriches led him to the theory of Evolution. For example, when he visited one part of Argentina, he noticed that the ostriches were similar, not the same, to ostriches from another region of Argentina. The fossil record also mimicked this loosely. Thus, Darwin began to look for a viable theory that could answer this. Hence, the theory of Evolution was born, which made the scientific explanation for life as we know it today. I hope this answers your question.
Darwin's theory, which is no longer just Darwin's, is the bedrock on which the modern discipline of Biology rests. All the disparate observations that naturalists made up to the time of Darwin suddenly had explanations. The species problem, how species arise, was, basically solved. Predictions from the theory could now be made and tested, just as they are made and tested today. " Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. " Dobzanski