Bacteria are considered to be living because they fulfill the requirements of the Cell Theory. Viruses, however, are generally classified as nonliving because they are not made of cells, they cannot reproduce independently, they generally do not react to noxious stimuli, etc.
It can't because it is NOT a living organism.
nonliving
Material formed from nonliving matter is soil. Organic dead debris and nonliving debris will break down either naturally or with the help of nature to form new soil.
melitensis is thought by some to be the "original"bacteria with genome variants making the other species specific bacteria if you will. It is considered the most pathogenic to humans. I have spelled it corectly.
All are made from matter.
streptococcus is living because it is a bacteria
Yes
yes
we can
A virus is considered non-living. It does not have all the characteristics of a living thing unlike bacteria. Viruses need living cells to reproduce while any living things can reproduce (asexually or not).
Because viruses are considered nonliving and they need a host to reproduce, therfore they cannot live on their own. Now bacteria can reproduce asexually, so they can get bigger and do not need a host..
Bacteria is considered flora.Bacteria is considered flora.
No...may be as a contaminant from living things such as bacteria, fungi etc.
As coconuts are seeds, they are considered living.
No prions are composed of protein - they are nonliving.
no, because bacteria is considered to be a prokaryotae
They cannot live outside of a host.