Bacteria are considered to be living because they fulfill the requirements of the Cell Theory. Viruses, however, are generally classified as nonliving because they are not made of cells, they cannot reproduce independently, they generally do not react to noxious stimuli, etc.
It can't because it is NOT a living organism.
nonliving
Material formed from nonliving matter is soil. Organic dead debris and nonliving debris will break down either naturally or with the help of nature to form new soil.
melitensis is thought by some to be the "original"bacteria with genome variants making the other species specific bacteria if you will. It is considered the most pathogenic to humans. I have spelled it corectly.
All are made from matter.
Pimples are a result of the body's immune response to bacteria in the pores, making them a nonliving manifestation of this process. They contain bacteria, dead skin cells, and oil but are not considered living entities on their own.
streptococcus is living because it is a bacteria
Viruses are considered nonliving because they cannot carry out metabolic processes or reproduce independently; they require a host cell to replicate. In contrast, bacteria are classified as living organisms because they possess cellular structures, can metabolize nutrients, and reproduce autonomously through binary fission. Additionally, bacteria can carry out essential life functions, such as responding to stimuli and maintaining homeostasis, which viruses cannot do.
Viruses are considered nonliving because they lack cellular structure, cannot reproduce independently, and require a host cell's machinery to replicate. They do not exhibit metabolic processes on their own and are essentially passive entities outside of a host. In contrast, bacteria are classified as living organisms because they possess cellular structure, can reproduce independently through binary fission, and carry out metabolic processes essential for their survival. Bacteria can grow, respond to stimuli, and adapt to their environment, all of which are hallmarks of life.
Yes
we can
A virus is considered non-living. It does not have all the characteristics of a living thing unlike bacteria. Viruses need living cells to reproduce while any living things can reproduce (asexually or not).
Because viruses are considered nonliving and they need a host to reproduce, therfore they cannot live on their own. Now bacteria can reproduce asexually, so they can get bigger and do not need a host..
No...may be as a contaminant from living things such as bacteria, fungi etc.
As coconuts are seeds, they are considered living.
no, because bacteria is considered to be a prokaryotae
They cannot live outside of a host.