Hey however you are! This is an obvious answer. If you have long sleeves they can catch on fire during an experiment, touch chemicals that can hurt you, mess up your hands, knock over a substance while hovering over it, etc.... no need to go on. you get the point! :) Next time think a little harder, dont be afraid to use your noggin! :)
Common sense: if you spill something, your lab coat gets it, not you.
Goggles for the eyes, gloves for the hands, and an apron/lab coat. I prefer the lab coat. long sleeves if you are prone to splashing, but fitted clothes. not loose ones that can catch fire. same with long hair: tie it back.
tie back your hair. roll up your sleeves. wear goggles when dealing with chemicals.
1. Keep long hair tied 2. Don't wear sandals or open-toed shoes. 3. Don't smell directly from the bottle, swift the fumes towards you 4. Don't throw any wastes down the sink. 5. Don't wear long loose sleeves.
im not sure if this is what you mean, but some lab thermomometers contain mercury and when mercury enters the human body its extremely toxic and can cause brain damage and other such things.
Answer: They are raised in a Lab Answer: You cannot conclude that because animals are safer where scientists are that they are ONLY lab animals; it is very possible (and extremely likely in this scenario) that they are wild animals. If the animals are in a lab then safety is moot; their is no need for drawing an inference, there is no danger to the animals. How does this follow? The question has 4 postulates: 1) There is danger to the animals: scientists reduce the danger. You cannot reduce something that doesn't already exist, therefore initial danger has to be > 0. 2) The initial danger is NOT from the scientists: see #1, the scientists augment the existing danger, they are not the originators. 3) In a closed environment there is no external danger to the animals: a controlled environment defies uncontrolled danger; all is controlled. 4) The scientists are not working in a closed environment (lab) - see #2, #3 the scientists are the only source of danger in the lab environment; since by definition there is initial danger besides the scientists there must something not being controlled, BUT a lab is a controlled environment. 5) Inferences are based on incomplete data, generally about environments that are not controllable. QED they are speaking of animals in the wild. You can say it's possible: 1) Animals are safer because they are being watched closely; poachers are less likely to interfere. 2) A change in the environment (the scientists there) can disrupt the predators and more animals are protected from attack by predator. (a numbers game - are 10 antelopes worth bothering one lion?) 3) Diseased animals are more likely to be cured or destroyed (ending the passing of disease) by scientists thereby increasing health of the rest of the herd.
Long pants, long sleeves, and probably goggles.
i think so because at my school chem lab you have to
Goggles for the eyes, gloves for the hands, and an apron/lab coat. I prefer the lab coat. long sleeves if you are prone to splashing, but fitted clothes. not loose ones that can catch fire. same with long hair: tie it back.
Long loose sleeves can.
Long Sleeves, Short Sleeves, Sleevless (vest tops) Elbow Lengnth Sleeves, cuffed sleeves, tight sleeves, baggy sleeves.wow sleeves has lost all meaning to me now.
The logo that alerts you about a specific danger during lab activities is a safety symbol.
tank tops don't have sleeves
Long sleeves have been around as long as there has been cold weather and people have been making clothing.
Because if we react sodium with acid in the lab it will be very danger (It can barn the lab )
Emos may wear long sleeves to cover up self-harm scars or to express their personal style and individuality. Some emos also prefer the aesthetic of long sleeves as it can create a sense of comfort or security.
A shirt is an item of clothing that has a collar and may have long or short sleeves. A vest on the other hand, has no sleeves.
No he sometimes wore short sleeves.