0
What else can I help you with?
When scientists gain new information what do they often revise?
The scientists often revise the hypothesis.
How often are scientists wrong?
Very often. Scientists make a lot of mistakes. Cause they don't do some of their experiments with love.
When scientists collect data what are often trying to find out?
Scientists are often trying to find out whether certain factors changed or remained the same.
Why scientists often test the conclusion of other scientists?
Scientists do that because they are skeptical about other scientists' work. They do not usually believe what other scientists have concluded, so other scientists come up with a hypothesis (or simply state a question) as to contradict, or theorize why another scientists' work and conclusions are wrong. In short: Scientists are skeptical and do not believe what another scientist has come up with as a conclusion.
Which kind of sample is most frequently used by social scientists?
Social scientists most often use a random sample
Why must scientists often deal with politics?
Scientists often deal with politics because their research can influence public policy, funding priorities, and regulatory decisions. Scientific findings can shape debates on critical issues such as climate change, healthcare, and technology, necessitating engagement with policymakers. Additionally, the allocation of resources for scientific research often depends on political will and public support, making it essential for scientists to navigate the political landscape to advocate for their work and its implications.
Why must scientists deal with politics?
Scientists must deal with politics because policy decisions often rely on scientific research and data to inform regulations and funding. Political support can impact the direction of scientific funding, research priorities, and public perception of science. Additionally, issues like climate change, public health, and technology ethics require scientists to engage with policymakers to ensure that scientific insights translate into effective and informed policies. Therefore, navigating the political landscape is essential for advancing scientific goals and addressing societal challenges.
When does politics emerge according to many political scientists?
Politics often emerges when individuals or groups have competing interests or goals that need to be addressed through decision-making and governance. Many political scientists believe that politics emerges as a way to manage conflicts and allocate resources within a society.
What are scientists that study politics called?
A political scientist studies politics and policy.
Did the people of the bible deal in politics?
no, not the way we do these days
What is a TECHNOCRAT?
Someone with a good knowledge of technology and who uses it to make decisions, often at a high level in politics, bureaucracy or politics. In political cases, they would not be the elected representatives, but often their advisors or people who help run an administration.
What do political scientists do?
Political scienctists are like lawyers, they talk about politics
Who are scientists that deal with classification of living things?
They are taxonomists.
Are public administration and politics dispersible?
They have become so intertwined that it really is just for the administration to understand the politics and deal with them accordingly
When scientists gain new information what do they often revise?
The scientists often revise the hypothesis.
What factors do scientists need to deal when exploring the deep ocean?
The factors needed by the scientists to deal when exploring the deep ocean is:* ecological and economical impacts; * understanding; * intention or focus; * observations and * materials needed in exploring
What did Woodrow Wilson hate to do?
Woodrow Wilson disliked engaging in the political maneuvering and deal-making often required in the legislative process. He preferred intellectual discourse and principles over the practicalities of politics, which he found distasteful. Additionally, Wilson had a strong aversion to the partisan nature of politics, often expressing frustration with the need to compromise his ideals for the sake of political expediency.
