In the 1500s and 1600s, European attitudes toward science shifted due to the Renaissance's emphasis on Humanism, which encouraged inquiry and the exploration of classical texts. The Reformation also played a role by challenging traditional authorities, fostering a spirit of skepticism and investigation. Additionally, the Scientific Revolution introduced empirical methods and experimentation, exemplified by figures like Galileo and Newton, leading to a greater appreciation for observation and rational thought in understanding the natural world. This transition laid the groundwork for modern scientific practices and a more progressive view of knowledge.
Globalization has significantly transformed societal attitudes toward science by promoting greater collaboration and information sharing across borders. Access to diverse scientific knowledge and advancements has fostered a more inclusive perspective, encouraging public engagement and support for scientific endeavors. Additionally, global challenges such as climate change and pandemics have heightened awareness of the importance of science in addressing complex issues, leading to a greater appreciation for scientific research and innovation. However, it has also sparked debates over scientific integrity and the ethical implications of scientific advancements, reflecting a more critical and informed public discourse.
Science and society are deeply interconnected; scientific advancements often shape societal norms and values, while societal needs and challenges drive scientific inquiry. For instance, public health issues can prompt research into vaccines, which in turn can influence social behaviors and policies. Conversely, societal attitudes toward issues like climate change can impact funding and focus in scientific research. This reciprocal relationship highlights the importance of collaboration between scientists and communities to address complex challenges effectively.
It doesn't always work, but science tries to work toward reality and objective truth, rather than opinions.
The 1500s and 1600s was the time of the Renaissance and then the Enlightenment. Both were concerned about man, nature, and how things worked. The Scientific Revolution started in the 1500s during the Renaissance. This is heralded by the publication of Andreas VesaliusÕs book On the Workings of the Human Body. Nicolaus Copernicus, Galileo Lalilei, Tycho Brahe, and Johannes Brahe were other scientists of this time period to advance science. In the 1600s, the scientific method became more widespread. Isaac newton is one of the scientists most closely associated with this time period.
It would be simplistic to say that science has civilized us. Science has given us a much greater capability to live civilized lives, but it has equally well given us the capacity for new and more terrible barbarities. To a very large extent, civilization depends more upon what people think, and what their attitude is toward the society in which they live, than it does upon science and technology.
Cause they want to change there attitudes
yes
Suspicion of European society as decadent and aristocratic
suspicion of European society as decadent and aristocratic.
f86666666
What is russian attitudes toward democracy?
In medieval times, Jews were utterly mistreated.
people started to figure out slavery was not right
In medieval times, Jews were utterly mistreated.
True
some attitudes of workers toward themselves that they have less motivation .
In general there was no difference between these attitudes; except that European courts had determined that "Native Americans" were the legal land owners in [the] Americas and that settlers could not just take the land from them. For this, and only this reason, the attitudes of English Settlers was different.