Other scientists initially rejected Alfred Wegener's theory of continental drift due to a lack of a plausible mechanism explaining how continents could move. Wegener proposed that continents drifted through the oceanic crust, but he could not provide sufficient evidence for this process. Additionally, the prevailing belief in fixed continents and the dominance of geological theories, such as land bridges and sedimentary processes, made it difficult for his ideas to gain traction. It wasn't until the development of plate tectonics in the mid-20th century that Wegener's ideas were vindicated.
yes because they didnt know how wegners inteligence was and they should have tried it in the firts place anyway it would have helped relize that his hypothesis waas correct when they dobt of him!
because scientist cant observe well if they didnt have any good observation skills
Gregor Mendel was the first scientist to study inherited traits.
Uniformitarianism, the idea that geological processes operate at the same rates and in the same ways as they do today, faced skepticism because it challenged the prevailing belief in catastrophism, which emphasized sudden, dramatic events shaping the Earth. Many scientists were reluctant to accept this new perspective due to the lack of empirical evidence and the deeply ingrained views of Earth's history. Additionally, the concept required a significant shift in thinking about time scales, as it suggested that geological changes occur over vast periods, which was difficult for many to grasp at the time.
No they didnt
Because wegner didnt have proof to show what caused mountains.
if u didnt know i am a scientist and im Marie curie so beat that
He didnt know anything after
if the scientist didnt apply the new things then the improvement which was made in the past. will be invained.
yes because they didnt know how wegners inteligence was and they should have tried it in the firts place anyway it would have helped relize that his hypothesis waas correct when they dobt of him!
yes because they didnt know how wegners inteligence was and they should have tried it in the firts place anyway it would have helped relize that his hypothesis waas correct when they dobt of him!
yes because they didnt know how wegners inteligence was and they should have tried it in the firts place anyway it would have helped relize that his hypothesis waas correct when they dobt of him!
he didnt work with any other scientists
some did some didnt
he didnt he had to ask jack woods to support him
because scientist cant observe well if they didnt have any good observation skills
they didnt.