answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

There are several reasons:

* To inform other scientists who are interested in the same sort of thing of the progress that has been made. Others can either stop looking, incorporate their answer to part of the question that was puzzling them, or move onto the next stage of the problem. * To establish that they were the first to discover the answer to a problem. This provides "bragging rights" and helps them become credible in their community. Publicity is an essential part of getting more money for future research etc * To promote peer review and comment. Everyone is blind to their own faults. Different eyes may see problems that the first researcher has missed

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

So other scientists may conduct the same experiment and see if they get the same results.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why do Scientists publish the details of important experiments?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Why do scientist publish the details if important experiments?

Scientists publish the details of important experiments so that people can recreate it and see the results for themselves.


Scientists publish the details of important experiments so that?

Scientists publish the details of important experiments so that: 1. Others can try to reproduce the results. 2. Their work can be repeated. 3. Their experimental procedures can be reviewed.


What is importance of scientist publishing details of important experiments?

It is very important for scientists to publish important details because other scientists can reach to a conclusion of their experiment and they can give their opinion of how to improve it and also how to notify other people about the experiment so others are aware of it.


What do scientists do when experiments show their hypotheses to be incorrect?

Hopefully the publish their negative results.


Why do scientists publish the results of experiments before creating a Theory?

Sometimes the scientists can't think of a suitable theory to explain their results but publish their experiments anyway to provide data for others so maybe another scientist can create a theory.


When scientists are ready to publish the result of their experimentation why is it important for them to include a description of the procedures they use?

Good science is reproducible, meaning that other scientists should be able to conduct the same analysis and get similar results. If scientists try the experiments and get different results, then it often means that the original publishers did something wrong.


When scientists are ready to publish the results of their experimentation why is it important for them to include a description of the procedure they used?

Good science is reproducible, meaning that other scientists should be able to conduct the same analysis and get similar results. If scientists try the experiments and get different results, then it often means that the original publishers did something wrong.


When scientists are ready to publish the result of their experimentation why is it important for them to include a description of the procedures they used?

Good science is reproducible, meaning that other scientists should be able to conduct the same analysis and get similar results. If scientists try the experiments and get different results, then it often means that the original publishers did something wrong.


How did ideas Spread Among Scientist and Mathematicans?

Part of a scientist's job is to publish his ideas, experiments, and theories for other scientists to test and confirm


When scientist are ready to publish the results of their experimentation why is it important for them to include a description of the procedures they used?

Good science is reproducible, meaning that other scientists should be able to conduct the same analysis and get similar results. If scientists try the experiments and get different results, then it often means that the original publishers did something wrong.


When scientist are ready to publish the results of their experimentation why is it important for them to include a description of the procedures the used?

Good science is reproducible, meaning that other scientists should be able to conduct the same analysis and get similar results. If scientists try the experiments and get different results, then it often means that the original publishers did something wrong.


Why was the printing press an important part of the scientific revolution?

Apex:It made it easier for scientists to publish their findings and share their research with other scientists.