0
Historians have different views about the same event because of bias, gender, because of personal background., etc. And example of this would be the Holocaust. As we all know the Holocaust did happen. but some people will try to say no its not real and it did not happen. it just all depends on the evidence and you and what you are willing to believe!
~K.Zebra~
What else can I help you with?
What is an educated guess called in science?
A hypothesis, or a probable explanation for an event, is sometimes called an educated guess.
What step is scientific method is described in each event?
To accurately identify which step of the scientific method is described in each event, you would need to provide specific events or scenarios. Generally, the scientific method includes steps such as making observations, forming a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing data, and drawing conclusions. Each event would correspond to one of these steps based on its context and purpose in the research process.
Is an inference a prediction?
An inference is not exactly the same as a prediction, though they are related concepts. An inference involves drawing conclusions based on evidence and reasoning, often from existing information or observations. In contrast, a prediction specifically anticipates a future event or outcome based on current knowledge or trends. While both involve reasoning, predictions are more forward-looking, whereas inferences typically deal with conclusions about the present or past.
What the different between doing and during?
doing is when you are displaying your actions during is an event that took place
What are the different terms associated with events?
Different terms associated with events include "event planning," which refers to the process of organizing and coordinating various aspects of an event. Other key terms include "venue," the location where the event takes place; "agenda," which outlines the schedule and activities; and "RSVP," a request for guests to confirm their attendance. Additionally, "catering," "logistics," and "program" are essential terms related to managing the details and execution of an event.
Who do historians sometimes draw different conclusions about the same event?
Historians may draw different conclusions about the same event due to varying interpretations of evidence, differing perspectives influenced by their backgrounds or ideologies, and the availability of sources. Additionally, the context in which historians work can shape their analyses, leading to emphasis on different aspects of an event. The subjective nature of historical interpretation means that multiple narratives can coexist, reflecting the complexity of human experiences.
How can personal biases and points of view influence historians when they are studying evidence?
Answer this question… They can lead historians to arrive at very different interpretations of an event.
What do historians mean when they refer to the historians context of an event?
When a historian refers to the historical context of an event they mean that they want you to look at the attitude, conditions and mood of the time of a specific historical event.
Which information can historians learn by studying absolute chronology?
By studying absolute chronology, historians can ascertain the exact dates and time periods of historical events. This enables them to establish a clear timeline of events and understand the sequence in which they occurred. It also helps historians correlate different events happening simultaneously in different regions and analyze the impact of one event on another.
What do historians mean when they refer historical context of an event?
the circumstances surrounding the event
Why would a researcher use a secondary source instead of a primary source when analyzing a historical event?
To learn from the conclusions of many other experts on the event.
Why do historians have to evaluate the sources about a past event?
Historians evaluate sources about past events to assess their credibility, reliability, and bias, ensuring a more accurate understanding of history. Different sources may present conflicting accounts, and critical analysis helps identify the context, perspective, and potential motivations behind each source. This evaluation process allows historians to construct a well-rounded narrative while acknowledging the complexities of historical interpretation. Ultimately, it enhances the integrity of their conclusions and contributes to a more nuanced view of the past.
Conclusions related to historical events are limited to subjective evaluation of the existing evidence?
Conclusions about historical events often rely on the interpretation of available evidence, which can be influenced by the historian's perspective, biases, and the context in which the evidence is examined. As new artifacts, documents, or methodologies emerge, interpretations can shift, highlighting the fluid nature of historical understanding. Consequently, while evidence provides a foundation for conclusions, the subjective evaluation of that evidence means that different historians may arrive at varying interpretations of the same event. This inherent subjectivity underscores the complexity of studying history.
a historians makes a interpretation when he or she?
Gives meaning to an event or action.
When historians talk about the present the are referring to event that?
They are talking about now in the present.
What specific event to historians referred to as the fall of Rome?
the surrender of Rome
Which stamens describes why historians might want to use a source to study an event?
It describes the event as it was experienced at the time. (APEX)
