0
Historians have different views about the same event because of bias, gender, because of personal background., etc. And example of this would be the Holocaust. As we all know the Holocaust did happen. but some people will try to say no its not real and it did not happen. it just all depends on the evidence and you and what you are willing to believe!
~K.Zebra~
What else can I help you with?
What is an educated guess called in science?
A hypothesis, or a probable explanation for an event, is sometimes called an educated guess.
What step is scientific method is described in each event?
To accurately identify which step of the scientific method is described in each event, you would need to provide specific events or scenarios. Generally, the scientific method includes steps such as making observations, forming a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing data, and drawing conclusions. Each event would correspond to one of these steps based on its context and purpose in the research process.
What the different between doing and during?
doing is when you are displaying your actions during is an event that took place
What are the different terms associated with events?
Different terms associated with events include "event planning," which refers to the process of organizing and coordinating various aspects of an event. Other key terms include "venue," the location where the event takes place; "agenda," which outlines the schedule and activities; and "RSVP," a request for guests to confirm their attendance. Additionally, "catering," "logistics," and "program" are essential terms related to managing the details and execution of an event.
What step of the scientific method is described in each event?
To accurately identify the step of the scientific method involved in each event, I would need specific events or scenarios to analyze. Generally, the scientific method includes steps such as making observations, forming a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing data, and drawing conclusions. If you provide specific events, I can help pinpoint which step corresponds to each one.
Who do historians sometimes draw different conclusions about the same event?
Historians may draw different conclusions about the same event due to varying interpretations of evidence, differing perspectives influenced by their backgrounds or ideologies, and the availability of sources. Additionally, the context in which historians work can shape their analyses, leading to emphasis on different aspects of an event. The subjective nature of historical interpretation means that multiple narratives can coexist, reflecting the complexity of human experiences.
How can personal biases and points of view influence historians when they are studying evidence?
Answer this question… They can lead historians to arrive at very different interpretations of an event.
What do historians mean when they refer to the historians context of an event?
When a historian refers to the historical context of an event they mean that they want you to look at the attitude, conditions and mood of the time of a specific historical event.
What do historians mean when they refer historical context of an event?
the circumstances surrounding the event
Why would a researcher use a secondary source instead of a primary source when analyzing a historical event?
To learn from the conclusions of many other experts on the event.
Which information can historians learn by studying absolute chronology?
By studying absolute chronology, historians can ascertain the exact dates and time periods of historical events. This enables them to establish a clear timeline of events and understand the sequence in which they occurred. It also helps historians correlate different events happening simultaneously in different regions and analyze the impact of one event on another.
Why do historians have to evaluate the sources about a past event?
Historians evaluate sources about past events to assess their credibility, reliability, and bias, ensuring a more accurate understanding of history. Different sources may present conflicting accounts, and critical analysis helps identify the context, perspective, and potential motivations behind each source. This evaluation process allows historians to construct a well-rounded narrative while acknowledging the complexities of historical interpretation. Ultimately, it enhances the integrity of their conclusions and contributes to a more nuanced view of the past.
a historians makes a interpretation when he or she?
Gives meaning to an event or action.
When historians talk about the present the are referring to event that?
They are talking about now in the present.
What specific event to historians referred to as the fall of Rome?
the surrender of Rome
Which stamens describes why historians might want to use a source to study an event?
It describes the event as it was experienced at the time. (APEX)
What are two rules historians use to determine the quality of a primary source?
Historians use the time and place rule to determine how close to the event was the person describing the event and how much time was between the event and when the event was described. In addition, they use the bias rule. Documents must be compared with relatedsources and pieces of evidence.
