Many people conflate scientific laws and theories because both are fundamental components of scientific understanding. A scientific law describes a consistent, observable phenomenon, often expressed mathematically, while a theory is a comprehensive explanation that encompasses and interprets various phenomena, based on evidence and experimentation. The distinction lies in the fact that laws describe "what" happens, whereas theories explain "why" it happens. This misunderstanding can stem from the use of the term "law" implying certainty, leading to the assumption that it is equivalent to a well-established theory.
"Mistake," or some other word meaning essentially the same thing.
A social construct
That most are left handed-
It has been scientifically proven that underwear are beneficial to people who have to sneeze while they have diarrhea.
Well yeah. Its called a theory because it wasn't proven right yet. Once proven right, its called a fact.
A scientific theory is something that has not been 100% proven to work in all situations. A scientific law or principle is a known principle that has been proven to work and affects all situations. There are special circumstances that take place in theory's and laws.
yes, it is proven that the internet can slow down reaction time.
If you have actually proven it, you should go to a psychiatrist and discuss it with him so he can decide if you need treatment.
Yes it is proven to be a big mistake. Pakistan became a terrorist nation and a threat to the whole world . Pakistan created to protect muslims but the irony is that in the whole world largest number of muslims are being killed in pakistan because of it's terrorists
I'm thinking 13 after the Higgs was proven.
Whomever made the mistake should be the party to correct it. Since you are being vague about what you are talking about I can't give you a more specific answer about who to go to for fixing it. Whatever the mistake, I imagine that you will have to do some legwork in order to make sure that the mistake is proven and brought to light.
Take your title back to the DMV, and have a new on printed. Basically, you need to re-title your vehicle, but if the mistake is proven not your fault, it should be at no cost to you.
proven
A material mistake refers to a significant error or misunderstanding in a contract or agreement that affects its fundamental terms. This type of mistake can involve incorrect assumptions about facts, laws, or conditions that are essential to the parties' agreement. If proven, a material mistake may allow one or both parties to rescind or modify the contract. Courts typically assess whether the mistake was mutual or unilateral and whether it had a substantial impact on the contract's validity.
Unless it can be proven that there was 'bad-faith' involved in the alleged mistake (i.e.: that it wasn't a "mistake" at all) unfortunately not very much. You have to be able to prove bad intent or prove that some actual harm arose from the mistaken identity mix-up.
No, it has not been scientifically proven that most people's favorite color is blue.
Strange question. IF it was a mistake, then it wasnt a repo (ie: wrong car, not in default,ect) OTOH, the lender is responsible for any PROVEN damage done to the car while in their possession.