I think you mean why is more electricity produced by fossil fuels than by nuclear? Largely history I think, and the availability of reasonably cheap coal and natural gas in the US. In France for instance, with little coal and no natural gas, nuclear has been developed to supply roughly 75 percent of electricity.
Norway is the European country that produces the most hydroelectric power. Its abundant rivers and water resources make it an ideal location for harnessing hydroelectric energy.
It is simple to transport oil and gasoline to power stations because they can be easily transported by pipelines, trucks, and ships. These transportation methods are well-established and efficient, allowing for the timely delivery of fuel to power stations to keep them running smoothly. Additionally, the infrastructure for storing and transferring oil and gasoline is widespread and readily available.
Petrol is not typically burned in power stations because it is more commonly used as a fuel for vehicles due to its high energy density. Power stations tend to use fuels like coal, natural gas, or renewable sources such as solar or wind because they are more suitable for generating electricity on a larger scale. These fuels are often more cost-effective and efficient for power generation than petrol.
There are currently no geothermal power stations operating in Britain, but some geothermal projects are being developed for the future.
Hydroelectric energy offers a number of advantages for people who use it, the environment, and electricity suppliers. Read on to learn more about the advantages of hydroelectric power: 1. Using this type of energy to generate electricity is not dependent upon the price of uranium, oil, or other types of fuel. This makes electricity costs lower and more stable, one of its most significant advantages. 2. The pollution created by hydroelectric energy generation is quite minimal. There is some pollution involved in initially constructing the power stations, but this is true of all power plants. It also does not produce radioactive waste or involve the environmental impact of fuel being transported to it. 3. It doesn't require many employees to run a hydroelectric station. According to wikipedia.org, most plants of this type are largely automated. This is another one of the advantages which help keep the cost of hydroelectricity low. 4. Hydroelectric power stations can be set up in almost any size, depending upon the river or stream used to operate them; big enough to power a single home, factory, small town, or large city. 5. Another of its advantages is that hydroelectric is a renewable form of energy, like wind and solar; it does not rely upon finite resources like natural gas or coal to generate power. 6. Hydroelectric stations can operate for many years after they are built. Wikipedia.org states that a number of operational hydro stations were constructed fifty to one-hundred years ago; in contrast to this, IAEA.org indicates that the "design life" of nuclear power plants is generally thirty to forty years. 7. Small hydro electricity generation systems sometimes offer more economic advantages for home owners than solar power, and tend to last longer than solar panels do. 8. Hydroelectricity can emit just as many greenhouse gasses from plant decay down the river, as conventional methods of getting electricity.
There are around 2,000 hydroelectric power stations in Britain. These power stations generate renewable energy by using the flow of water in rivers and streams to turn turbines and produce electricity.
Hydroelectric power is about 90% efficient while fossil fuels are about 60% efficient.
a hydroelectric dam is efficient because it generates power
because the conditions for a hydroelectric power stations in the uk aren't right so only a few can be built.
A power station that harnesses power from running water.
Hydroelectric power stations certainly have their advantages and disadvantages, as do all forms of electrical generation. Probably the best solution is to use a combination of different means of producing electricity, with hydroelectric stations as part of the mix.
Moving water can be used to generate electricity in hydroelectric power stations.
It is efficient at 35% (When created in power stations)
No, they can't, they have to be powered up and down over several hours - especially nuclear power stations. This is why hydroelectric power stations are so useful to deal with surges in power demand, they can go from zero to full in seconds - Dinorwig Hydroelectric powerstation is the fastest, taking 12 seconds to go from 0 - 1,320 mw.
Tidal power stations require specialized technology to capture energy from changing tides, which is still in the early stages of development and more expensive to build and maintain compared to traditional hydroelectric power stations. Additionally, tidal power stations face more technical challenges due to the harsh marine environment, increasing their construction and operation costs.
for the passage of flood discharge
i don't now so haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa