Most microscopes do not use a 30x eyepiece because higher magnification can lead to a decrease in image brightness and clarity due to the limited amount of light entering the eyepiece. Additionally, higher magnifications can amplify optical aberrations and reduce the depth of field, making it harder to focus on specimens. Most standard microscopes are designed for optimal performance with lower magnifications, typically around 10x to 15x eyepieces, which balance detail and usability effectively.
they dont
No, a centimeter is 100,000 times smaller than a kilometer.
T-boned as in steak, a large piece of meat. (surley i dont have to draw you a picture) ----------- You are T-boned when another car crashes head-on into the side of your car.
Jammed and then unjammed ??If it had been jammed into something it will be red and swollen. If small piece of skin has been jammed it might go purple. It will be very painful. IT IS VERY VERY VERY PAINFUL, so dont do it stupid... :D
Microscopes are very usefull tools to science and aid in a wide variety of tasks. They can be used to examine miroscopic life, perform extremely tiny tasks such as with microscopic circuits or machines, or to study chemical or geological samples like microscopic crystals formed by many substances.
they dont
Yes, professional astronomical telescopes typically have greater magnification capabilities compared to telescopes sold in stores. This allows astronomers to observe celestial objects with greater detail and clarity. Professional telescopes also have larger apertures and specialized optics to gather more light and enhance image quality.
i dont really know any thing about Biology cause i dont have a favorite subject i think all the subjects are wack...........
No clue so please dont ask me.
yes it is but i dont know if this is correct.
A light microscope uses a light source but a electron microscope has beams of electrons focused by magnetic lenses.- - -The major difference in practice is resolution: the amount of detail that can be discerned in the image.Under optimal conditions (excellent lenses, oil immersion) the resolution of a light microscope is about 0.2 micrometers (or 0.000,000,2 meters or 2 thousandths of a millimeter). Objects that are closer together cannot be detected as separate. The resolution of an transmission electron microscope is about 0.05 nanometers (or 0.000,000,000,05 meters or half of 1 millionth of a millimeter). This means that the electron microscope has about 10,000 times the resolving power of the light instrument, and can therefore show far greater detail, for example of subcellular structure.Another difference of importance to biologists is that light microscopes (there are several kinds, such as bright field and phase contrast) enable the viewer to watch living cells. The electron microscope produces an image of the shadows cast by atoms of heavy metals used as stains; the living tissue is destroyed by the intense beam of electrons.
they use electron microscopes on human objects because they need it to look at things too small to be seen with a light compound microscope.
i think it something that looks things up close lol i dont know really
No one exactly knows the exact number of how many electron microscopes there are in the world but the estimation would depend on how strong these microscopes are (as i dont know much about electron microscopes).
dont ask me, I dont know
Stereoscopic microscopes, also called low-power microscopes, dissection microscopes, or inspection microscopes, are designed for viewing "large" objects at low magnifications. Unlike a compound microscope which provides an inverted 2-dimensional image, stereo microscopes provide an erect (upright and unreversed) stereoscopic (3-dimensional) image......
i dont really understand this question but what i do know is what i will tell you it is the amount of detail in an object