a ladder could be used to interpret the emission of light when an electron gets excited, moves to a higher rung, and then falls to a lower or bottom rung. otherwise, it shows nothing of how the atom is constructed, the number of protons, neutrons, electrons, etc
A Millikan atom model doesn't exist.
An atom's structure is like a ladder because of the energy levels. Each step is a different level of energy. The bottom step is the lower energy level and the top step is the higher energy level.
The nuclear atom differs from the uniform sphere model, because they both are made from different atoms because of the elements.
The Bohr Model is the modern name used by scientist for a model of an atom, which is often referred to as the Rutherford-Bohr model due to the fact that Neils Bohr just improved Ernest Rutherfords model.
the scientist behind the concept of the atom are joseph john thomson,goldstein, and james chadwick!
no it isn't a good model
its a good model because it shows you the atom written out. it also helps to show you the valence electron number
Its easier to understand. His model is simple, he compared it to a ladder which is easily visualized where the quantum model is difficult involves hard equations.
A model of the atom is a 3-D structure of the atom's structure.
This is the quantic model of atom.
The Bohr model of the atom was a planetary model.
A relay race could be a good model of a series circuit. In any circuit, current flow is the daisy-chaining of electrons from atom to atom.
it gives good represention of what a atom looks like
Today the model of atom is based on quantum mechanics.
A model of the atom is a 3-D structure of the atom's structure.
A Millikan atom model doesn't exist.
Plum-pudding model of atom.