answersLogoWhite

0

Have to much water flow

User Avatar

Wiki User

7y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Why are swamps more productive thsn streams?

Swamps are more productive than streams because they have more nutrients and organic matter for plant growth, as well as a higher diversity of plant and animal life. Swamps also have slower flowing water, allowing for more accumulation of nutrients and organic material.


Why are rivers more productive than swamps?

The water flow in rivers is too high.Rivers are less productive than swamps because swamps just like marshes have the highest primary production of all the world's ecosystems.


Why are swamps more productive that streams?

Swamps are more productive than streams because they have higher levels of nutrients and organic matter, which support the growth of a wide variety of plant and animal species. The slow-moving water and saturated soil in swamps create a rich environment for plants to thrive and provide habitat for many aquatic organisms. Additionally, swamps act as natural filters, trapping sediment and contaminants that can negatively impact water quality in streams.


If Swamps are more productive than streams because streams .?

Swamps are often more productive than streams because they provide a stable environment with abundant nutrients and slower water flow, allowing for greater plant growth and biodiversity. The saturated soil in swamps supports a rich array of vegetation, which in turn supports a diverse range of wildlife. In contrast, streams have faster-moving water that can limit the accumulation of organic material and nutrients, resulting in lower overall productivity. Additionally, the dynamic conditions in streams can make it challenging for certain species to thrive.


Why are swamps more productive than steams?

Swamps are typically more productive than streams because they have more nutrients trapped in the sediment, more plant life for energy production, and a wider range of habitats for organisms to thrive in. The slow-moving water in swamps also allows for a greater accumulation of organic matter and provides a unique environment for various species to coexist.


Why are rivers less productive than swamps?

They are not!They are not!They are not!They are not!


Why is a stream less productive than a swamp?

A stream is less productive than a swamp primarily due to its faster water flow and lower nutrient retention. The swift current in streams can wash away organic matter and nutrients, limiting the growth of aquatic plants and organisms. In contrast, swamps have slower-moving water, allowing for more nutrient accumulation and greater biodiversity, which supports a rich ecosystem. Additionally, swamps often have more stable environmental conditions that foster higher productivity.


Why is a swamp more productive than a stream Give one reason?

A swamp is more productive than a stream primarily due to its rich nutrient availability and diverse plant life, which support a greater biomass. Swamps typically have stagnant water that allows for sediment accumulation, enhancing nutrient cycling and providing a habitat for various organisms. Additionally, the dense vegetation in swamps offers more surfaces for microbial growth and interactions, contributing to higher overall productivity.


Why are antarctic seas more productive than tropical seas?

Because cold water is more productive for animal life than warmer water.


What are the five features of a computer that make it more productive than human beings?

write the five features of computer that more productive than a human being?


What Rivers are less productive than swamps because?

Rivers are generally less productive than swamps because they tend to have faster water flow, which limits the accumulation of nutrients and organic matter essential for supporting diverse ecosystems. Additionally, the constant movement of water in rivers can wash away sediments and reduce habitat complexity, making it harder for aquatic plants and animals to thrive. In contrast, swamps often have stagnant or slow-moving waters that promote nutrient retention and provide rich habitats for a wide variety of species.


Is it better to hire a more qualified and productive worker than a less qualified and productive one regardless of cost?

Is it always better to hire a more qualified and productive worker than a less qualified and productive one regardless of cost. True or false? Explain